T. Farzana ( Bismillah Taqee Blood Diseases Centre, Karachi. )
T. S. Shamsi ( Bismillah Taqee Blood Diseases Centre, Karachi. )
M.Irfan ( Bismillah Taqee Blood Diseases Centre, Karachi. )
S. H. Ansari ( Bismillah Taqee Blood Diseases Centre, Karachi. )
M. I. Baig ( Bismillah Taqee Blood Diseases Centre, Karachi. )
N. Shakoor ( Bismillah Taqee Blood Diseases Centre, Karachi. )
September 2003, Volume 53, Issue 9
Original Article
Introduction
Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation has replaced bone marrow transplantation during last 15 years.6 Published data suggests that in allogeneic PBSC, there is rapid engraftment, lesser blood component usage, early hospital discharge and lower incidence of acute GvHD.7-9 Randomised studies comparing PBSC vs. BMT in allogeneic setting clearly show faster haemopoietic and immune recovery and reduced relapse rate in PBSC groups.10,11 However, these studies did not show significant difference in acute and chronic graft versus host disease in two groups. In Pakistan, until recently immunosuppression was the only modality of treatment available for these patients. During the last 3 years peripheral blood stem cell transplantation programme was started in our centre. Here we describe our experience in 20 cases of aplastic anaemia.
Patients and Methods
Results
haemorrhage on day+7, herpes encephalitis on day +180, graft failure and mucour mycosis on day +353 and TB meningitis on day +544. Allogenic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation resulted in 80% event free survival in our hands. Only one death was seen beyond one-year post transplant in a patient who was off immunosuppressive drugs.
Discussion
Recent studies have shown that PBSC results in rapid haematological and immunological recovery without excessive aGvHD compared to BMT.8,14 This results in a reduced transfusion requirement before immunological recovery, early discharge and lower transplantation costs. Data from the literature suggest that PBSC appears safe for paediatric donors, yields sufficient progenitor stem cells and results in prompt engraftment.11 The median neutrophil engraftment was day +9 and all patients achieved it by day +12. Mobilization of PBSC and collection by aphaeresis has practical advantages for the donor over conventional marrow harvest i.e. no general anaesthesia or pain at the sites of bone punctures. G-CSF appears safe and well tolerated in children. There are some adverse effects like myalgia, bone pain and fever.11 Various dose schedules are in use for stem cell mobilization, even lower dose of 5 mcg/kg seemed to have yielded sufficient stem cells. Post aphaeresis, mild thrombocytopenia was observed in all donors.15,16
Many early studies reported around 50% long-term survival in aplastic anaemia post BMT. Recent studies report survival rates of 60 - 90%. Improved survival in recent years may reflect better patient selection, earlier transplantation, changes in transplantation regimens, and/or supportive care or some combination of these factors.3,5 Although we lost four patients, treatment related mortality i.e. within first 100 days occurred in only one patient. Our initial results of 81% survival in severe aplastic anaemia patients after allografts are encouraging in the developing world setting.
To conclude, allogeneic PBSC transplantation is life saving in severe aplastic anaemia. This procedure produced comparable results in a developing country setting. Since we are the first centre to embark on allogeneic stem cell transplantation, our learning curve is expected to improve with time and better patient selection.
Acknowledgements
Refrences
2. Young NS. Immunosuppressive treatment of acquired aplastic anaemia and immune-mediated bone marrow failure syndromes. Int J Hematol 2002;75:129-40.
3. Deeg J, Leisenring W, Storb R, et al. Long term outcome after marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anaemia. Blood 1998;91:3637-45.
4. Georges GE, Storb R. Stem cell transplantation for aplastic anaemia. Int J Hematol 2002;75:141-6.
5. Locatelli F, Bruno B, Zecca M, et al. Cyclosporin A and short term methotrexate versus cyclosporin A as graft versus host disease prophylaxis in patients with severe aplastic anaemia given bone marrow transplantation from an HLA identical sibling: results of a GITMO/EBMT randomised trial. Blood 2000;96:1690-7.
6. Eapan M. Report on state of the art in blood and bone marrow transplantation. IBMTR/ABMTR Newsletter 2002;9:4-11.
7. Champlin RE, Schimitz N, Horowitz MM, et al. Blood stem cells compared with bone marrow as source of haematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation. IBMTR histocompatibility and stem cell sources working committee and EBMTR. Blood 2000;95:3702-9.
8. Storek J, Dawson MA, Storer B, et al. Immune reconstitution after allogeneic marrow transplantation compared with blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 2001;97;3380-9.
9. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral blood cells from HLA identical relatives in patients with haematological cancer. New Engl J Med 2001;344;175-81.
10. Powels R. Mehta J, Kulkarni S, et al. Allogeneic blood and bone marrow stem cell transplantation in haematological malignant diseases: a randomised trial. The Lancet 2000;355:1231-7.
11. Benito AL, Gonzalenz-Vicent M, Garcia F, et al. Allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from HLA identical sibling in children with haematological diseases: a single centre study. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2001;28:537-43.
12. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft versus host disease in human recipients of marrow from HLA matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974;18:295-304.
13. Passweg JR, Socieacute G, Hinterberger W, et al. Bone Marrow Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anaemia: Has Outcome Improved? Blood 1997;91:858-64.
14. Stroncek D, Anderlini P. Mobilized PBPC concentrates: a maturing blood component. Transfusion 2001;41:168-71.
15. De La Rubia J, Diaz M, Verdeguer A, et al. Donor age-related differences in PBPC mobilization with rHuG-CSF. Transfusion 2001;41:201-5.
16. De Fabritiis P, Lori AP, Mengarilli A, et al. CD 34+ cell mobilization for allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation: efficacy of a short course of G-CSF. Transfusion 2001;41:190-5.
Abstract
Objective:
To assess the feasibility of stem cell transplantation in local setting.
Setting: A tertiary care haematology centre.
Study Design:
This is a single centre retrospective analysis of the outcome of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anaemia.
Objectives:
Preliminary data on stem cell transplantation in Pakistan.
Patients and Methods:
Aplastic anaemia is an uncommon disorder with a high mortality without treatment. Immunosuppression and bone marrow transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment. Stem cell transplantation facility became available in Pakistan in 1999, since then both allogeneic and autologous procedures are carried out for severe aplastic anaemia, b-thalassaemia major and haematological malignancies. Between April 2000 and July 2002, 20 allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplants were carried out for aplastic anaemia from HLA identical siblings. Donors were primed with G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for 4 days; stem cells were harvested on 5th day using Haemonetics MCS+ cell separator. Cyclophosphamide was used for conditioning; cyclosporin A and methotrexate were given for graft versus host disease prophylaxis.
Results:
Eighteen out of 22 patients survived transplant in a follow up period of 788 days. The causes of death were intra-cranial haemorrhage on day +7, herpes encephalitis on day +180, graft failure and mucour mycosis on day +353 and TB meningitis on day +544. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation resulted in 81% event free survival in our hands.
Conclusion:
Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is feasible and life saving in an otherwise fatal disorder. This could be carried out effectively in Pakistan (JPMA 53:381;2003).
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




