By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

May 2020, Volume 70, Issue 5

Research Article

Diagnostic significance of biochemical markers and pentraxin-3 in the differential diagnosis of malign, benign pleural effusion and empyema

Isa Dongel  ( Department of Thoracic Surgery, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey )
Aysegul Aksoy Gokmen  ( Department of Medical Microbiology, Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey )
Hasan Ekrem Camas  ( Department of Thoracic Surgery, Rize State Hospital, Rize, Turkey )
Ibak Gonen  ( Department of Infectious Disease, Medical Park Silivri Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. )
Selcuk Kaya  ( Department of Medical Microbiology, Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey )

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic significance of biochemical markers and pentraxin-3 in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions.

Methods: The prospective clinical study was conducted at the Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, from January 2013 to June 2014, and comprised patients with pleural effusion. Pleural effusions were tested for glucose, protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and pentraxin 3 while simultaneous C-reactive protein and white blood cell levels were studied in the serums. Data was analysed using SPSS 22.

Results: Of the 96 patients, 48(50%) had malignant disease, 33(34%) had benign pleural effusion, and 15(16%) had empyema. In terms of glucose, protein, lactate dehydrogenase in the pleural effusions and C-reactive protein values in serums, significant differences were observed among the three groups (p<0.05). The pentraxin-3 levels in the empyema group was significantly higher than in the benign cases (p<0.033). No significant difference was observed in terms of the other variables between the groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Serum C-reactive protein and pentraxin-3 levels were not found to be individually conclusive in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. Also, lactate dehydrogenase levels were higher and glucose levels were lower in empyema.

Keywords: Pentraxin-3, Empyema, Pleural effusion, C-reactive protein, White blood cell. (JPMA 70: 860; 2020).

https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.17181

 

Introduction

 

Pleural effusion (PE) is caused by an imbalance between the secretion and absorption in the pleural cavity due to malignant or benign diseases. While congestive heart failure (CHF) and para-pneumonic effusions (PPE) are among the most common benign causes of effusions, pulmonary and mammary cancers are among the most common causes of malignant PE.1,2 In 5-25% of PEs, the aetiology is unknown. Thus, new biochemical markers are required for an early diagnosis and treatment, and to prevent morbidity and mortality.3 Pentraxin-3 (PTX-3) is a recently discovered acute phase marker resembling the C-reactive protein (CRP) in terms of structure and function. While CRP belongs to the family of short pentraxins, PTX- 3 belongs to the long pentraxin family. Although CRP is a marker of inflammation, it is synthesised in the liver instead of being released from the area of inflammation. In contrast, PTX-3 is released from the macrophages, neutrophils, fibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells in the inflammation area. It is already known that the serum PTX-3 level is a new biochemical marker in inflammatory or vascular conditions such as heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, vasculitis and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.4-6 PEs are a common clinical finding among patients admitted to hospitals. PEs can cause many different complaints and disrupt the quality of life of the patients. Therefore, it is crucial to make the correct differential diagnosis and to plan the treatment without wasting time. There is still a need for new biochemical markers to facilitate differential diagnosis in PEs. The current study was planned to investigate the diagnostic significance of biochemical markers and PTX- 3 in the differential diagnosis of PEs.

 

Patients and Methods

 

The prospective study was conducted from January 2013 to June 2014 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Suleyman Demirel University (SDU), Isparta, Turkey, and comprised patients with PE. After approval was obtained from the institutional ethics review committee, the sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1 (Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany) with 95% power and 5% error level.7,8 Age, gender, and diagnosis of the patients were noted, including malignancy status to decide about tube thoracostomy and/or surgery. All malignant PE patients were diagnosed histopathologically and were positive for PE cytology. Volunteer patients older than 20 years were included, and patients with congestive heart failure were excluded in the study. Tube thoracostomy was placed in order to diagnose and treat PE patients with exudative characteristic that fills more than 50% of the hemithorax, pushes mediastina and leads to recurrent respiratory problems. Drainage was stopped when it decreased to <100cc per day. PEs were tested for glucose, protein and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), while simultaneous Creactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) levels were studied in the serums. Also, approximately 20cc of PE was sampled and sent to the microbiology lab. The PEs were centrifuged at 2000g in the microbiology lab, and after the removal of the formed elements, the supernatant serum phase was transferred into Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80OC. All the PTX-3 levels in the PE serum were tested simultaneously in the microbiology laboratory of the Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey, under doubleblind conditions using the micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method in line with the quantitative standards based on the Human-PTX-3 ELISA Kit (Boster Biological Technology, CA) protocol and were measured at 450nm wavelength on the ELISA plate reader (Bio-Tek ELx808, USA). The contribution of PTX-3 to differential diagnosis of malignant, benign and empyemadependent PEs was evaluated, but the association with survival was not evaluated in the Data was analysed using SPSS 22. Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction at p=0.10 was used to find which groups caused the difference in the comparison of PTX-3 positivity and to compare the mean ages of the patients according to the gender. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

 

Results

 

Of the 96 patients, 48(50%) had malignant disease, 33(34%) had benign PE, and 15(16%) had empyema. Overall, 77(80.2%) subjects were males with a mean age of 62.341±6.06 (range: 20-88) and 19(19.8%) were females with a mean age of 61.63±14.78 (range: 31-81) (p<0.05). Among those with malignant PE, the condition was caused by pulmonary cancer in 18(37.5%), mesothelioma in 6(12.5%), mammary cancer in 12(25%), pancreatic cancer in 3(6.25%), and other malignant causes in 9(18.75%) patients. In terms of glucose, protein, LDH in PE, and CRP values in serums, significant differences were observed among the three groups (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed among the groups regarding the WBC results. In the case of CRP values, all the paired comparisons between the groups resulted in statistically significant differences (p<0.033). In patients with empyema, PTX-3 was significantly higher than benign cases (p<0.033). The difference in the PTX-3 levels between benign and malignant PEs was statistically non-significant (p>0.05). Glucose values in PE were significantly lower in the empyema group compared to malignant or benign PE (p<0.05), while LDH values were significantly higher (p<0.033) (Table 1).

When the results from the diagnostic tests based on the CRP and PTX-3 values in the diagnosis of empyema were assessed, the sensitivity of CRP was 96.3%, specificity 41.03%, and the cut-off value was 39.9. The sensitivity of PTX-3 was 33.33%, specificity 98.06% and the cut-off value was 48.9. The area under the curve (AUC) of CRP was 0.665 (95% CI: 0.525-0.805; p<0.05). The AUC of the PTX-3 0.642 (95% CI: 0.481-0.804; p>0.05) (Table 2).

The resulting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were also charted (Figure).

 

Discussion

 

The present study demonstrated that serum CRP and PE PTX-3 levels were not individually conclusive in the differential diagnosis of PE. While PE is easy to detect radiologically and clinically, it is difficult to find out its aetiology. Some patients cannot be diagnosed even by using radiological methods and microbiological, biochemical and cytological analyses for PE. These diagnostic difficulties necessitate the investigation of new markers in PE. In literature, the diagnostic complications faced during the aetiological examination of PEs are mentioned and many cases are interpreted as idiopathic due to these complications.6,9 Acute-phase proteins are various proteins produced mainly in the liver due to the increase in cytokines - mainly in interleukin-6 (IL-6) - resulting from an acute or chronic inflammatory incident. CRP starts to increase shortly after the onset of the inflammation to reach its maximum level within 48 hours. Its half-life (19 hours) does not differ between patients and healthy individuals and it rapidly responds to therapy with diminishing levels. These characteristics and its easy and cost-effective testing in many laboratories render CRP an important parameter in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory conditions.10,11 In recent years, CRP has become more widely used to scan suspected inflammatory diseases, to evaluate the activity of inflammatory diseases, to diagnose and follow up infections, and in the differential diagnosis of inflammations. Studies on CRP in PEs and the PE/serum levels are increasing in number. Thus, there are studies focussing on the serum CRP levels, PE CRP levels, and the PE/serum CRP separately or in combination in literature.10,11,12 On the other hand, PT X-3 is released from the macrophages, neutrophils, fibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells in the inflammation area. It is already known that serum PTX-3 level is a new biochemical marker in inflammatory or vascular conditions such as CHF, acute coronar y syndrome, vasculitis and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.13 In a study14 where serum CRP and PTX-3 levels were tested in 136 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia who were mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours, the threshold value of PTX-3 was >16.43ng/ml, specificity 74% and sensitivity 68.6%. It was reported that PTX-3 was not found to be superior to CRP in ventilator-associated pneumonia although it is an early marker in inflammation reaching its peak earlier than the CRP, and has a greater diagnostic value for mortality.14 However in the present study, it was observed that the serum CRP and PE PTX-3 values were not strong markers in the differential diagnosis of PE. Ozsu et al.6 reported cut-off value of PTX-3 as 12ng/ml, sensitivity 88%, specificity 73%, and AUC 0.85 (95% CI: 0.769-0941) in patients with PPE. The study also reported that the PTX-3 value was correlated with the pleural neutrophil count and the serum CRP levels, and it was higher than the levels in malignant or other exudative PEs.6 However, some studies have suggested that the high PTX-3 levels in certain malignant effusions are associated with the activation of the inflammatory pathways due to metastasis or proliferation.11-13 In another study conducted on 118 patients with PEs, pleural PTX-3 value was more significant than CRP in the differential diagnosis of parapneumonic and other malignant or tuberculosisassociated PEs. It reported PTX-3 cut-off value 25.00ng/mL, sensitivity 62%, specificity 81%, and AUC 0.74 (95% CI: 0.063-0.084).15 A study on the diagnostic value and prognostic significance of pleural CRP in lung cancer patients with malignant PEs reported that pleural-CRP levels correlated with serum-CRP levels (r=0.82, p<0.0001).12 For the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign PEs, the area under the ROC curve was greater for pleural-CRP than for serum-CRP. As a result, pleural- CRP was considered superior to serum-CRP in determining PE aetiology.12 The present study would have been more valuable if serum-CRP values had been compared by testing PE CRP values. This may be a limitation of the study. In another study conducted in order to distinguish exudative effusions from transudates in patients with PEs, the sensitivity of PE CRP was high, while its specificity was low.16 In the present study, serum CRP cut-off value was >39.9 in patients with empyema, and the sensitivity was high (96,33%) in the serum while the specificity was low (41,03%). In another study specifying the viral agents using the multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PRC) method on the nasal smears from 117 paediatric patients with lower respiratory tract infections, serum PTX-3 value in the patient group was correlated with procalcitonin and uncorrelated with CRP; and no significant difference was observed between the type of the viral infection and the PTX-3 levels.17 The fact that PTX-3 increases independently from the viral agent may explain the low results observed in our study regardless of the bacterial, viral or fungal agents and the lower sensitivity in case of empyema. Based on the results of the current study, further studies are recommended to describe the diagnostic value of PTX-3 in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign PEs and empyema.

 

Conclusion

 

Serum CRP and PE PTX-3 levels were not individually conclusive in the differential diagnosis of PE. Also, LDH levels were higher and glucose levels were lower in empyema. However, since the specificity of PTX-3 and the sensitivity of CRP were higher in PEs due to empyema in comparison to benign and malignant effusions, their combination may be an alternative route in the diagnosis of empyema.

 

Disclaimer: The manuscript was presented as a Poster at the Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery (TGCD) 2015 Congress.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Source of Funding: None.

 

References

 

1. Yalcin NG, Choong CK, Eizenberg N. Anatomy and pathophysiology of the pleura and pleural space.ThoracSurg Clin 2013; 23: 1-10

2. Light RW. Malignant pleural effusions. In: Pleural diseases. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1995, pp. 94-116.

3. Alemán C, Sanchez L, Alegre J, Ruiz E, Vázquez A, Soriano T, et al. Differentiating between malignant and idiopathic pleural effusions: the value of diagnostic procedures. QJM 2007; 100: 351-9.

4. Bottazzi B1, Doni A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. An integrated view of humoral innate immunity: pentraxins as a paradigm. Annu Rev Immunol 2010; 28: 157-83

5. Inoue K, Kodama T, Daida H. Pentraxin 3: a novel biomarker for inflamatory cardiovascular disease. Int J Vasc Med 2012; 2012: 657025.

6. Ozsu S, Abul Y, Mentese A, Bektas H, Uzun A, Ozlu T, et al. PTX-3: A novel biomarker for discriminating parapneumonic from other exudative effusions. Respirology 2013; 18: 657-62.

7. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149-60.

8. Bantis LE, Yan Q, Tsimikas JV, Feng Z. Estimation of smooth ROC curves for biomarkers with limits of detection. Stat Med 2017; 36: 3830-43.

9. Na JM. Diagnostic Tools of Pleural Effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis 2014; 76: 199-210.

10. Yilmaz Turay U, Yildirim Z, Türköz Y, Biber C, Erdogan Y, Keyf AI, et al. Use of pleural fluid CRP in diagnosis of pleural effusions Respir Med 2000; 94: 432-5.

11. Çirak AK, TekgülS, Bilaçeroglu S, Kömürcüoglu B, Uçar MA, Yalniz E. Diagnostic Values Of Pleural Fluid, And Serum CRP, Adenosine Deaminase, And Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels And Pleural Fluid/Serum Ratios In The Differentiation Of Malignant From Benign Pleural Effusions. Izmir Gögüs Hastanesi Dergisi 2012; 26: 75-81

12. Park DS, Kim D, Hwang KE, Hwang YR, Park C, Seol CH, et al. Diagnostic value and prognostic significance of pleural CRP in lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusions. Yonsei Med J 2013; 54: 396-402.

13. Lech M, Rommele C, Anders HJ. Pentraxins in nephrology: CRP serum amyloid P and pentraxin. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28: 803-11.

14. Lin Q, Fu F, Shen L, Zhu B. Pentraxin 3 in the assessment of ventilatorassociated pneumonia: an early marker of severity. Heart Lung 2013; 42: 139-45.

15. Yeo CD, Kim JW, Cho MR, Kang JY, Kim SJ, Kim YK, et al. Plural Fluid PTX-3 for the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2013; 75: 244-9.

16. Castaño Vidriales JL1, Amores Antequera C. Use of Plevral Fluid CReaktive- Protein in Laboratory Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions. Eur J Med 1992; 1: 201-7

17. Kim HS, Won S, Lee EK, Chun YH, Yoon JS, Kim HH, et al. Pentraxin- 3 as a clinical marker in children with lower respiratory tract infection. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016; 51: 42-8

 

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: