By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

March 2019, Volume 69, Issue 3

Letter to the Editor

Comments on Muhammad Hubab et al (J Pak Med Assoc. 68: 1517-1520, 2018) Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from post-surgical wounds of patients in tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan

Hira Maab  ( 3rd year Student, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan )
Shajeea Arshad Ali  ( 3rd year Student, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan )
Manahil Akmal  ( 3rd year Student, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan )

Abstract

Madam, We read with interest the article titled ‘Antibiotic Susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from postsurgical wounds of patients in tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan’ by Hubab et al. 1Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide2 and contribute to about fifteen percent of all hospital acquired infections.3Hence, we compliment the authors for investigating this essential subject matter.However, we would like to highlight certain technical aspects of the study which, if appropriately addressed by the authors, would have provided a better insight into their investigation. The authors stated that multiple agars such as MacConkey and blood were used to inoculate bacteria, albeit, all samples were later incubated aerobically for 24 hours at37°C.1 However, this technique would havecompletely destroyed anaerobes, which can be the potential causative agents in this case. In a similar study published in Maced J Med Sci, a total of 48 out of 1094(4.4%) specimens (swab, pus, aspirates, punctuates, necrotic tissue) were found to contain anaerobes.4 Anaerobic bacteria require special media for their isolation such as Schaedler agar. Moreover, a longer duration of time is allotted for their growthi.e. between 48-72 hours. 4 Therefore,it is a serious oversight not to consider anaerobic bacteria as the possible culprits in this experiment and limits the reliability of its results. Therefore, for accurate antibiotic susceptibility profiles, both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria should have been taken into account and separate culture media should have been used for their isolation.
​​​​​​​
Disclaimer: None.
Conflict of Interest:None.
Funding Sources:None.

References

1. Hubab M, Ullah O, Hayat A, Rehman MU, Sultana N. Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from post-surgical wounds of patients in tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018; 68: 1517-20.
2. Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008; 70: 3-10.
3. Reichman DE, Greenberg JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a review. RevObstet Gynecol. 2009; 2: 212-21.
4. Kaftandzieva A, Cekovska Z, Kaftandziev I, Petrovska M, Panovski N. Bacteriology of wound - Clinical utility of gram stain microscopy and the correlation with culture. Maced J Med Sci. 2012; 5: 72-7

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: