Mueenullah Khan ( Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi )
Aliya Ahmed ( Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi )
Laila Abdullah ( Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi )
Azmeena Nizar ( Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi )
Aslam Fareed ( Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi )
Fauzia Anis Khan ( Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi )
June 2005, Volume 55, Issue 6
Short Reports
Abstract
A review of all unanticipated admissions over a one-year period was done. The admission rate was calculated and the reasons for admission were analysed. The overall admission rate was 4.93%. Most of the admissions were ordered by the surgeons (97%). The main reasons for admission were patient observation indicated for various reasons (72%) and patient request (18%). Eighty percent of the admitted patients had received general anaesthesia. Admissions were also related to the male gender (69%), age over 65 years (27%) and surgeries ending in the afternoon (69%).
On analyzing the reasons for admission, a large number of admissions were found to be due to preventable causes. We conclude that proper selection of patients, careful scheduling of lists and education of patients and clinical professionals can help to avoid many unanticipated admissions after day care surgical procedures.
Introduction
With ongoing advancement in anaesthetic techniques and introduction of minimally invasive surgical procedures, day care facilities are growing both in quantity and complexity.1,2 Performing more procedures as day cases helps to reduce health care costs. It also makes the hospital experience less traumatic for the patients.1 In the face of this increase in case-load, it is important to maintain a high quality of care and ensure patient safety.
The unplanned admission rate is one measure of the quality of ambulatory surgery.1-6 When assessing the unplanned admission rate, the various reasons for admissions should be explored so as to identify the preventable elements and find solutions to avoid them. The purpose of
Methods and Results
Our surgical day care unit is within the hospital but is separate from the main operating room (OR) suite. It consists of an eighteen bedded day surgery ward, three ORs and a 3 bedded recovery room. The surgical specialties using the unit include ophthalmology, general surgery, urology, ear, nose, throat (ENT), paediatric surgery, plastic surgery, orthopaedics, minor vascular surgery, and paediatric oncology and endoscopy. After satisfactory discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) the patients are sent back to the DI ward from where they are discharged home by a trained registered nurse on the basis of set criteria.
All patients having their operations performed in the SDC ORs between September 1, 2002 and September 30, 2003 were included in our study. Data for two months (January and February 2003) could not be collected as SDC ORs were being refurbished. A specified SDC nurse filled out a pre-designed form for every patient who was admitted from the SDC unit. The information collected included patient's demographic characteristics, American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status score, surgical procedure, type and duration of anaesthesia and surgery,
| Table 1. Unanticipated admission rate according to surgical sub-specialty. | ||
| Sub-specialty | No. of admissions | Percentage |
| General Surgery | 84 | 38 |
| Paediatrics | 26 | 12 |
| Ophthalmology | 31 | 14 |
| Urology | 26 | 12 |
| Orthopaedics | 19 | 9 |
| ENT | 12 | 6 |
| Gynaecology/Obstetrics | 5 | 2 |
| Dental | 1 | 0.5 |
| Pain Management | 1 | 0.5 |
| Missing | 14 | 6 |
| Total | 219 | 100 |
start of surgery time, and surgical specialty. The reason for admission, the physician (sub-specialty) ordering the admission and the presence of any complications were also recorded. The data was analyzed by the investigators and the rate of unanticipated admissions was calculated as a proportion of the total operations performed in the SDC unit. The reasons for admissions were analyzed.
A total of 4440 procedures were performed in the day care operating rooms during the study period. Out of these 3293 (74.16%) procedures were performed under local anaesthesia, while 1147 (25.8%) patients received either general or regional anaesthesia, 2 patients were given monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) and 219 patients were admitted to the hospital postoperatively. This gives an admission rate of 4.93%.
| Table 2. Reasons for unanticipated admissions from the day care surgical unit of a university affiliated teaching hospital. | ||
| Reasons for admission | No. | Percentage |
| Patients request | 39 | 18 |
| Obervation | 158 | 72 |
| - nasal bleeding | ||
| - pain | ||
| - nausea/vomiting | ||
| - vertigo | ||
| - diarrhoea | ||
| - seizure activity | ||
| - bladder irrigation | ||
| - haematoma | ||
| Pain | 8 | 3.65 |
| Surgery after 1600 hours | 4 | 2 |
| Bleeding | 1 | 0.45 |
| Others | 7 | 3 |
| Missing | 2 | 1 |
| Total | 219 | 100 |
The majority of patients admitted were above 65 years of age (60/219). Other age groups showed an equivalent rate of admissions. The ASA physical status of the patients admitted was ASA I 100/219, ASA II 68/219, ASA III 15/219, ASA IV 4/219. This correlates with the physical status of our day surgical population. The highest admissions were needed for general surgical, ophthamological and paediatric procedures (Table 1). There was a predominance of the male gender in the patients admitted (151 compared to 65). Out of the 219 admissions, 175 (80%) patients had received general anaesthesia, 32 (15%) had undergone procedures under local anaesthesia, five patients had spinal blocks, one had a combined spinal/epidural block and two patients had received MAC.
The highest number of admissions occurred in patients whose operations ended in the afternoon (108/219); 97% (212) of the admissions were ordered by the surgeons. Patient's request [39 (18%)] and need for observation [158 (72%)] were found to be the main reasons for admission (Table 2) whereas pain [8 (3.65%)] and bleeding [1 (0.5%)] contributed to a much smaller number of admissions.
Comments
It is very important to monitor and maintain the quality of care in day-care surgery. Analysis of the reasons for admission is important so that the preventable causes can be identified and avoided to improve the efficiency of ambulatory surgical centres.
Many of the above reasons mentioned for admission in our study could be avoided by alteration in management or better selection of patients. Administration of intravenous antibiotics can be arranged at home. Good pain management is a challenge in day surgical patients. A multi-modal approach with narcotic and non narcotic agents and use of local anaesthetics (infiltration, intra-articular injection etc.) will help to decrease the number of admissions due to inappropriate pain relief.7
There is a scarcity of organized medical auxiliary support system or general practitioner support system in our country and this makes the patient and his family nervous about going home on the day of their operation. Better selection criteria and adequate counseling and education of the patients would help to reduce admissions due to these reasons.
References
1. Gold BS, Kitz DS, Lecky JH, Neuhaus JM. Unanticipated admissions to hospital following ambulatory surgery. JAMA 1989;262:3008-10.
2. Tham C, Koh KF. Unanticipated admissions after day surgery. Singapore Med J 2002;43:522-6.
3. Johnson CD, Jarrett PEM. Admission to hospital after day case surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:225-8.
4. Biswas K, Leary C. Postoperative hospital admission from a day surgery unit: A seven year retrospective
survey. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992;20:147-50.
5. Greenburg AG, Greenburg JP, Tewel A, Breen C, Machin O, McRae S. Hospital admission following ambulatory surgery. Am J Surg 1996;172:21-3.
6. Junger A, Benson M, Klasen J, Sciuk G, Fuchs C, Sticher J, et al. Influences and predictors of unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery. Anaesthetist 2000;49:875-80 (Abstract).
7. Redmond M, Florence B, Glass PSA. Effective analgesic modalities for ambulatory patients. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2003;21:329-46.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




