By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

May 1989, Volume 39, Issue 5

Editorial

AEROMONAS : THE FORGOITEN PATHOGEN

Rakhshanda Baqai  ( PMRC Research Centre, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi- 35. )

Diarrhoeal disease is caused by a variety of pathogens which include bacteria, parasites and viruses. Apart from the major aetiological agents (Salmonella, Shigella, pathogenic E. Coli) Aero­monas is also a significant enteric pathogen1. Its infection should always be looked for before con­sidering the culture as negative, because Aero­monas is not a part of normal human faecal flora2 or opportunist pathogen3. Aeromonas is widely distributed in nature and can be pathogenic to man and animal. It is a facultative anaerobic, gram negative rod shaped bacteria, first discovered in the last decade of 19th century as natural inhabitant of aquatic environ­ment and animals. Aeromonas has a cosmopolitan distribution in marine and freshwater, sewage, soil and food4. Survival seems to depend on moisture and the presence of organic matter5. Aeromonas have been recovered from tap water3, hospital water6, swimming pooi, lakes7 and rivers. Human infection is often related to water exposure5,8 and drinking of untreated water is risky for susceptable hosts9,10. Studies have shown simultaneous isolation from faeces and water sup­ply. Although several characteristics differ in clini­cal and environmental strains but many of the strains found in water have properties, identical with those of clinical isolates and they may be potential enteric pathogens11,12. Majority of iso­lates from human source are recovered from gast­rointestinal and intraabdominal sites and are transient in nature resulting in self limiting and lo­calized infection13,14. Animal and human carriers are also present15. Aeromonas may act as primary pathogen occurring during spring and summer and in children under two years of age. There have been reports of acute diarrhoea associated with Aeromonas hydrophilia16,17 but the virulence fac­tor varies from one country to another18. The dif­ference in isolation may be due to geographic location, seasonal difference and method of isola­tion19,20. Duration of illness is greater than 10 days with fever, abdominal cramps and vomiting21. Vol­unteer studies or intestinal biopsies of patients with diarrhoea may be required toestablish Aero­monas as gastrointestinal pathogen22. Aeromonas has been associated with a wide range of human infection, the site of infection and the host defence status defining the severity of disease. Positive cultures have been reported from bile in biliary obstruction, Cholecystitis23, and Se­pticaemia mostly in association with hepatobiliary disease, malignancy5, intraabdominal abscess and surgical wound infections24, urinary tract infec­tion, rare cases of meningitis, peritonitis, otitis and endocarditis1. Cellulitis or wound infection is re­lated to exposure to water or soil and occur most frequently during warm season25. Aeromonas grows well on moist enteric sel­ective medium. For isolation from faeces sheep blood agar added with ampicillin (15 ug per ml) can be used21. Overnight enrichment in alkaline peptone water yield 2-6 times more isolates as compared to other media like MacConkey agar and SS agar26. A. bydrophilia in faeces is detected by flooding the plate with oxidase reagent after growth. A positive oxidase test is an important biochemical properly of this genus. A. hydrophilia are hemolytic27. Identification can be done by API-20E28. Biochemical characters associated wi­th virulence and tests used for Aeromonas are positive Voges-Proskauer reaction, production of gas from glucose, fermentation of mannose and absence of B D glactosidase and esculin hydro­lisis29. Antibodies to A. hydrophilia (antihemo­lysin, agglutinin, precipitin) have been detected in patients with deep infection. Several toxic factors have been isolated from A. hydrophilia culture flu­terates (leucocidin, hemolysin, cytotoxin). A hydrophilia is resistant to Ampicillin and Carbencillin with variable susceptibility to Cep­halosporins, Polymixin and Tetracyclines. It is us­ually susceptible to aminoglycosides, Naladixic acid Nitrofurontoin, Chloramphenicol and Sep. tran30,31. Although there are reports regarding the presence of Aeromonas in diarrhoeal cases in In­dia8, Thailand32,33 and Bangladesh, it is possible that Aeromonas is present in diarrhoeal patients in Pakistan, therefore a preliminary study is pla­nned at PMRC Research Centre, Karachi to de­tect this neglected pathogen.

REFERENCES

1. Davis, W.A., Kane, J.G., and Garagusi, V.F. Human Aeromonas infection: a review of the literature and a case of endocarditis. Medicine, 1978; 57:267.
2. Moore, W.E.C., and Holdeman,L The human fecal flora of 20 Japanese. Hawaiian. AppI. Environ.MicrobioL, 1974; 27:916.
3. Meek, M.V. The Genus Aerornonas, methods for iden­tification. Am. J. Med. Technol., 1963; 29:361.
4. Hazen, T.C., Flitermans, C.B., Hirsch, R.P., Esch, G.W. Prevalence and distribution of Aeromonas hydrophiia in the United States. App. Environ. Microbiol., 1978; 36:731.
5. Slotnick, I.J. Aeromonas species isolates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1970; 174:503.
6. Conn, H. Spontaneous peritonitis and bacteremia in Laennec\'s cirrhosis caused by enteric organism. Ann. In­tern. Med., 1964; 60:568.
7. Rosenthal, S.G., Bernhardt, H.E., and Phillip, J.A. Aero­monas hydrophilia wound infection. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 1974; 53:77 (Abstract).
8. Stephen, S., Achyutha Rao, KN., Sitaram Kumar, M., and Induram, R Human infection with Aeromonas spe­cies. Varied clinical manifestations. Ann. Int. Med., 1975; 83:368.
9. Shotts, E.BJr., Rimler, R. Mediuni for the isolation of Aeromonas hydrophilia. Appl. Environ. Microbial., 1973-; 26:550.
10. Moyer, N.P. Clinical significance cf Aeromonas species isolated from patients with diarrhoea. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1987; 25:2044.
11. Burke, V., Cooper, J., Robinson, J., Gracey, M., Lesmana, M., Echeverria, P., and Janda, J.M. Hemagglutination patterns of Aeromonas spp. in relation to biotype and source. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1984; 19:39.
12. Bulger, It, and Sheggis, J. The clinical significance of Aeromonas hydrophilia. Arch. Intern. Med., 1966; 118:562.
13. von Graevenitz, A., and Mensch, A.H. The genus Aero­monas in human bacteriology. Report of 30 cases and review of literature. N. Engl. J. Med., 1968; 278:245.
14. Rosner, It Aeromonas hydrophilia as the etiologic agent in a case of severe gastroenteritis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1964; 42:402.
15. von Graevenitz, A., Zinterhofer, L The detection of Aeromonas in stool specimens. Health Lab. Sci., 1970; 7:124.
16. Burke, V., Gracey, M., Robinson, J., Peck, D., Beaman, J., and Bundell, C. The Microbiology of childhood gas­troenteritis; Aeromonas species and other infective age­nts. J. Infect. Dis., 1983; 148:68.
17. Trust, TJ., and Chipman, D.C. Clinical involvement of Aeromonas hydrophilia. Can. Med. Assoc. J., 1979; 120:942.
18. Figura, N., Marri, L., Verdiani, S., Ceccherini, C., Bar­beri, A. Prevalence, species, differentiation and toxi­genicity of Aeromonas strains in cases of childhood gastroenteritis and in controls. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1986; 23:595.
19. von Graevenitz, A., and Bucher, C. Evaluation of dif­ferential and selective media for isolation of Aeromonas and Plesiomonas spp from human faeces. J. Clin. Micro­bioL, 1983; 77:16.
20. Ljungh, A.M., Popoff, and Wadstrom, T. Aeromonas hydrophilia in acute diarrhoeal disease. Detection of enterotoxin and biotyping of strains. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1977; 6:96.
21. Agger, W.A., McCormick, J.D., and Gurwith, NJ. Clini­cal and Microbiological features of Aenomonas hydro­philia associated diarrhoea. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1985; 21:909.
22. Pitarangsi, C., Echeverria, P., Whitmira, it, Tirapat, C., Formal, S., Dammin, GJ., and Tingtalapong, M. Enter­otoxigenicityofAeromonas hydrophilia and Plesismonas shigelloides; prevalence among individuals with or with­out diarrhoea in Thailand. Infect. Immun., 1982; 35:666.
23. De Fronzo, k-A., Murray, G.F., and Maddrey, W.C. Aer­omonas Septicemia from hepatobiliary disease. Am. J. Dig. Dis., 1973; 18:323.
24. McCracken, A.W., and Barkely, R. Isolation of Aero­monas species from cFnical sources. J. Clin. Pathot, 1972; 25:970.
25. Washington, J.A. Aeromonas hydrophilia in clinical bac­teriologic specimen. Ann. intern. Med., 1972; 76:611.
26. Kay, B.A., Guerrero, C.E., and Sack, R.B. Media for the isolation of Aeromonas hydrophilia. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1985; 21:888.
27. Janda, J.M., Duion, A., Rancher, B., Clark, RB., Botton, EJ. Value of blood agar for primary plating and clinical implication of simultaneous isolation of Aeromonas hy­drophilia and A caviae from patients with gastroenteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1982; 20:1211.
28. Gilbert, S.M., Prabhudesai, M., and Magee, S.M. A case report, Aeromonas sobnia gastroenteritis in adult. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1985; 83:389.
29. Megraund, F. Incidence and virulence of Aeromonas species in feces of children with diarrhoea. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1986; 5:311.
30. Joseph, S.W, Daily, O.P., Hunt, W.S., Seidler, R.J., Allen, D.A., and Colwell, R.R. Aeromonas primary wound infection of a diver in polluted water. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1979; 10:46.
31. Washington, J.A. The in vitro spectrum of the ceph­alosponins. Mayo Clin. Proc., 1976; 51:237.
32. Echcverria, P., Blacklow, N.R., Sanford, L.B., and Cukor, G.C. Travellers diarrhoea among American Peace Crops volunteers in rural Thailand. J. Infect. Dis., 1981; 143:767.
33. Brauer, C., Schcftel, J.M., Rihn, B., and Montal, H. Isola­tion of Aeromonas hydrophilia in diarrhoea. Charac­terization of enterotoxigenic strains and clinical relations. Am. Biol. Gin. (Paris), 1985; 43:725 (Abs-tract).

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: