Sana Shoukat ( Pakistan Journal of Neurological Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi. )
Saqib Ali Gowani ( Medical Student, Aga Khan University, Karachi. )
Ameer Ali Khowaja ( Medical Graduate, Aga Khan University, Karachi. )
Javaid Ahmad Khan ( Pulmonary Section, Department Of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi )
March 2009, Volume 59, Issue 3
Short Reports
Abstract
Introduction
The global burden of asthma has reached an alarming level to worry physicians as well as health policy makers around the world. More than 300 million people worldwide suffer from this chronic potentially disabling disease and this figure is projected to rise by 50% every decade.1 Figures from other South Asian countries have shown to be as high as 29.5%2 and Pakistan may not be very different. Even though The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) study mentioned a prevalence of 8% in Pakistani paediatric population, under reporting and lack of sound epidemiological data may mask the reality.3
Previously, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines classified severity of asthma by dividing into subcategories based on the level of symptoms and airflow limitation and its variability.4,5 However, it must be realized that asthma severity involves both the severity of the underlying disease and its responsiveness to treatment. Hence, according to the updated GINA guidelines, assessing the severity alone is no longer recommended but emphasis has shifted to periodic assessment of asthma control.6
Literature highlights several tools currently in use to specifically assess asthma control, on the basis of patients' symptoms, rescue medication use and limitation of daily activities in adults and children.7,8 Most commonly utilized in clinical settings are the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), the asthma therapy assessment questionnaire (ATAQ) and the asthma control test (ACT).7
Of all the control assessment tools, ACT questionnaire is short, simple, comprising of 5 patient-based questions and more importantly cost effective as it does not encompass pulmonary function tests.9 Hence it is a promising assessment tool for our clinical setting. The ACT has been proven reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time in patients new to the care of asthma specialists.10 Its results have also been seen to be in concordance with specialists' assessments based on spirometry.9,10To our knowledge no study in the medical literature exists that assesses baseline control of asthma in Pakistan. Hence, the aim of our study was to assess asthma control among asthmatics at a tertiary care setting in Karachi using Asthma control test (ACT) questionnaire.
Patients, Method and Results
The Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire was filled by 150 patients who were known asthmatics. The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital during the [(f16)] month of January 2007. All individuals presenting to the clinic with a previously established diagnosis of asthma based on physicians' notes, pulmonary function tests and reversibility of effect and were 12 years and above were included. These participants were enrolled consecutively as they presented to the out-patient clinic. Patients with acute exacerbation or those below 12 years of age were excluded. The questionnaire is shown in the figure.
The ACT questionnaires were filled by patients with the help of a research medical officer (RMO). Written informed consent was taken before administering the questionnaire. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Department of Medicine, AKUH.
SPSS 15.0 (copyright © SPSS Inc., 1989-2007) was used for statistical analysis. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for all continuous variables and frequency and percentages for categorical data. Chi square was applied to assess association between different variables. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as significant.
A total of 150 questionnaires were filled regarding [(t16)] control of Asthma from known asthmatics. Out of 150 participants 61 (40%) were males and 89 (60%) females. Out of all participants, 62 (41%) had presented for the first time with a pre-established diagnosis of Asthma whereas 89 (59%) patients were followed in the same clinic for management of their disease.
Mean score on the ACT was found to be 17.71 +/- 4.41 with mean score for males of 18.23+/-4.68 and for females 17.35 +/- 4.2. ACT questionnaire categorizes the asthma control into 3 categories depending upon scores, that is, scores of <19, 20-24 and 25. In our study population, participants falling in these categories were 93 (63%), 47 (31%) and 10 (6.7%) respectively. Association between sex and asthma control was determined and was not statistically significant (p < 0.25).
While objectively assessing asthma control, antiasthmatic medications used by participants were also taken into account to determine their baseline control with any particular medication and to direct the management. Antiasthmatics used by the participants were calculated and were found to be Salbutamol 93 (62.0%), Ipratropium Bromide 20 (13.3%), Steroids 59 (39.3%), Montelukast 11 (7.3%), combination of beclomethasone +salbutamol (ventide) 3 (2.0%), theophylline 11 (7.3%) and antihistamines 6 (4.0%).
Associations between asthma control and antiasthmatic medications were determined (Table). Significant association was seen with asthma control and Ipratropium bromide inhaler (p <0.01).
Conclusion
Asthma control among patients at a tertiary care centre is not adequate. Asthma Control Test Questionnaire can be used to follow patients in the hospital. Validity and Reliability studies need to be conducted on a wider scale as with this small sample, asthma control could not be correlated with the recommended therapy for Asthma.
Acknowledgement
References
1. Malik IA, Luqman M, Ahmed A, Khan A, Legters LJ. Sporadic non-A, non-B hepatitis: a sero-epidemiological study in urban population. J Pak Med Assoc 1987; 37: 190-2.
2. Jamil B, Hasan R, Zafar A, Bewley K, Chamberlain J, Mioulet V, et al. Dengue virus serotype 3, Karachi, Pakistan. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13: 182-3.
3. Dengue and Dengue haemorrhagic fever. (Online) [Cited 2008 Sep 18]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/.
4. Gubler DJ. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 480-96.
5. Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. Diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. 12th ed. Geneva: WHO, 1997.
6. Suh K, Kozarsky PE, Keystone JS. Evaluation of fever in the returned traveler. Medical Clin North Am 2000; 83: 997-1017.
7. Chaturvedi UC, Nagar R, Shrivastava R. Macrophage & dengue virus: Friend or foe? Indian J Med Res 2006; 124: 23-40.
8. Prusty BK, Hedau S, Singh A, Kar P, Das BC. Selective suppression of NF-kBp65. In hepatitis virus-infected pregnant women manifesting severe liver damage and high mortality. Mol Med 2007; 13: 518-26.
9. Thio CL, Carrington M, Marti D, O'Brien SJ, Vlahov D, Nelson KE, et al. Class II HLA alleles and hepatitis B virus persistence in African Americans. J Infect Dis 1999; 179: 1004-6.
10. Palmer DR, Sun P, Celluzzi C, John Bisbing, Somnang Pang, Wellington Sun, et al. Differential Effects of Dengue Virus on infected and Bystander Dendritic Cells. J Virol 2000; 79: 2432-9.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




