Nawab Khan Mangrio ( LSU, SDSSP, Sanghar )
Muhammad Mazhar Alam ( Sindh Government Qatar Hospital )
Babar Tasneem Shaikh ( Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi. )
February 2008, Volume 58, Issue 2
Original Article
Abstract
Methodology: Key informants interviews and focused group discussions were carried out involving district and town health officers, health providers, vaccinators, lady health visitors and lady health workers.
Results: The study result showed that the problems hampering the routine immunization related mainly to lack of incentives and restricted mobility of health workers in the field. Political interference, flaws in monitoring of routine immunization, disinterest of facility based doctors and lack of private sector involvement in the provision of vaccine are other major problems. National immunization days (NIDs) so far had a negative impact on routine immunization coverage.
Conclusion: There is need of policy shift to integrate routine immunization with NIDs for polio which will help in improving routine immunization along with eradication of Polio. More incentives and clear service structure for vaccinators will raise the motivation among the EPI staff. The budgetary constraints must be overcome by involving all stakeholders both foreign and local. Public and private sector must work hand in hand to achieve the goal. Lastly, political will and support is mandatory to sustain the efforts of EPI (JPMA 58:64;2008).
Introduction
In Pakistan, Expanded Programme of Immunization was started in the year 1978 with the ultimate objective of reduction in morbidity and mortality caused by six vaccine preventable diseases.4 In addition, vaccination against
Hepatitis B was included in EPI in July 2001. In 1980, Polio 3 coverage was just 2% which was increased to 54% by 1990. Onwards, progress was not encouraging, despite all the donor attention and investment. Pakistan could show only 58% coverage for Polio 3 in year 2000.1,5 Thereafter, initiative of National Immunization days (NIDs) had rather a mixed impact on overall immunization coverage.6 Government increased budget allocations to EPI due to donor withdrawal and thus coverage began to improve again from 1998 onwards with little fluctuations among the years. Besides, national immunization days, mass immunization campaigns have also gained great deal of acceptance in the communities.7 However, after the lapse of 26 years, mortality from the vaccine preventable diseases is still high. Among various core reasons, most commonly observed are the lack of motivation of EPI staff, absence of vaccinators and inconvenient place of immunization and problems with cold chain.8,9 Community perspective related to issues of EPI coverage in Sindh has been captured through different studies.10 A number of evaluations of the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) have also been carried out to identify the knowledge, attitude and practice of population.11 Mass immunization campaigns though increase awareness about vaccination are not as cost-effective for raising coverage as the delivery of vaccines through routine services.12-13
The objectives of this qualitative study were threefold: to understand the issues in routine coverage; to explore perceived barriers that are present to achieve the required target; and to identify practical measures that may be taken to eliminate these constraints.
Methodology
Results
Service structure of EPI staff: All the participants showed a great deal of dissatisfaction over the incentives, allowances and the overall service structure in the department. "I was only once given a bicycle allowance in my 20 years of service", a male vaccinator informed. Lady vaccinators talking about the service structure mentioned, "I was appointed in grade 5 and I am still serving on same position since the last 20 years. I think that I will retire at the same". Many vacant positions exist both at tehsil and district level. "Vaccinators are working very hard in health department, but instead of offering incentives for performance we are rather intimidated by either stopping or delaying our salaries", reflect the EPI personnel.
Attitude of doctors in health facilities: It was a common complaint that the health facility doctors neither refer the children for vaccination to the EPI centre nor welcome any EPI activity at their health centres. "Facility-based doctors are not taking requisite interest. They feel that they are merely to see the patients and to look after the facility only. They pay very little attention towards routine immunization activities", cites a district health officer. The role of paediatrician cannot be ignored and most of the participants did recognize it. However, the trend is that paediatricians do not refer the eligible children to EPI centres. "They supply routine vaccination from their private clinics but with no record maintenance", narrated one participant.
Private sector involvement: It is a gigantic task for public sector alone to reach all the children in a huge populous country like Pakistan. Therefore, it is very important to involve private sector in providing routine immunization services. One of the senior district officer, said "The private hospitals and clinics must be first brought under the government regulations by registration and formal memorandum of understanding, in order to keep check and monitoring system on their performance".
Involvement of Lady Health Workers: The National Programme for Family Planning & Primary Health Care recruits Lady Health Workers (LHWs), who have a minimum of 8 years of school education and are residents of the village they serve. They are trained for 15 months covering topics of essential maternal and child health and family planning services, management of common ailments and health education for the general population. Each LHW has to serve approximately 1000 individuals, delivering door to door services including Direct Observation Therapy Short Course (DOTS) for tuberculosis. Everybody was appreciative of their potential role that they can play in polio eradication campaign and suggested that, "If we formally train and involve LHWs, it will give us tremendous results”. During FGD with LHWs, it was narrated by participants that they are cooperating with vaccinators in certain areas and these areas have higher immunization coverage.
Political interference in EPI staff management: Political influences regarding appointments and postings of vaccinators, and absenteeism among the staff who are politically supported, was generally raised as a serious concern. In one district during FGD, participants expressed apprehension over the poor performance of vaccinator of their catchment area. "In our area, the vaccinators come after every six months; even then they are not carrying immunization cards". The health managers were also very critical of the political pressures and wanted authority to deal with the matters related to appointments and postings of EPI staff. "The district officers should be given full power to deal with the absentee vaccinators and powers to take action against them without any political pressure".
Effects of NIDs on routine immunization: A collective feeling was that the NIDs have a detrimental effect on routine immunization because it keeps the vaccinators busy at least one week before and one week after the NIDs in which they only concentrate on polio vaccination and the campaign related arrangements. Particularly, in rural areas, routine immunization comes to naught during NIDs. "The vaccinators are unable to carry routine immunization because of the additional responsibility entrusted during NIDs for covering 150-200 children in one day, door-marking, record keeping in tally-sheets, locating and marking the missing children etc". According to them the work of routine immunization suffers because their vaccinators remain engaged in pre campaign (team selection/training, social mobilization, banners/posters pasting, polio walk, vaccine collection and distribution), campaign (Polio vaccination, monitoring and facilitating of teams) and post campaign activities (catch up and submission of reports).
Discussion
The road map to implement and achieve millennium development goals on child mortality emphasize on the fundamental role of immunization.20 Government of Pakistan with all its commitments, finances only 61% of the total immunization expenditure.21
Conclusion
References
1. World Health Organization. State of the World's Vaccines and Immunization. Geneva: 2002.
2. World Health Organization. Expanded Programme on Immunization. Immunization policy: global programme for vaccines and immunization. Geneva: 1996. (WHOGPV/GEN/95.03 Rev.1).
3. World Health Organization. Global eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000. World Health Assembly. Resolution no. 41.28. Geneva: 1988.
4. Ali SZ. Health for all in Pakistan: achievements, strategies and challenges. East Mediterr Health J 2000; 6:832-7.
5. Expanded Programme on Immunization. Financial Sustainability Plan 2003-2012. Federal EPI/CDD Cell, National Institute of Health. Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan. Islamabad: 2003.
6. Hong R, Banta JE. Effects of extra immunization efforts on routine immunization at district level in Pakistan. East Mediterr Health J 2005; 11:745-52.
7. Khan MI, Ochiai RL, Hamza HB, Sahito SM, Habib MA, Soofi SB et al. Lessons and implications from a mass immunization campaign in squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan: an experience from a cluster-randomized double-blinded vaccine trial. Trials 2006; 7:17.
8. Ahmad N, Akhtar T, Roghani MT, Ilyas HM, Ahmad M. Immunization coverage in three districts of North West Frontier Province (NWFP). J Pak Med Assoc 1999; 49:301-5.
9. Provincial EPI Directorate. Expanded Programme of Immunization: Logistics Inventory. Department of Health, Punjab: 2000.
10. Mansuri FA, Baig LA. Assessment of immunization service in perspective of both the recipients and the providers: a reflection from focus group discussions. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2003; 15:14-8.
11. Rafi S, Shah IA, Rao MH, Billoo AG. Expanded programme of immunization in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc 1995; 45:34-7.
12. Dietz V, Cutts F. The use of mass immunization campaigns in expanded programme on immunization: a review of reported advantages and disadvantages. Int J Health Serv 1997; 27: 767-90.
13. Anjum Q, Omair A, Inam SNB, Ahmed Y, Usman Y, Shaikh S. Improving vaccination status of children under five through health education. J Pak Med Assoc 2004; 54: 610-3.
14. Health policy for the province of Sindh 2005. Paving the way for health sector reform. Health Department. Government of Sindh, 2005.
15. Program Support Unit. Guidelines for Annual Sector Plan: Health Sector. Sindh Development Social Services Program. Finance Department, Government of Sindh 2005.
16. Ministry of Health. National EPI policy and strategic guidelines. Government of Pakistan, Islamabad: 2005.
17. Loevinsohn B, Hong R, Gauri V. Will more inputs improve the delivery of health services?: Analysis of district vaccination coverage in Pakistan. Int J Health Plann Manage 2006; 21: 45-54.
18. Bonu S, Rani M, Baker T. The impact of national polio immunization campaign on levels and equity in immunization coverage: evidence from rural North India. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57:1807-19.
19. Shaikh BT. Quality of care: an absolute necessity of patient's satisfaction. J Pak Med Assoc 2005; 55: 515-6.
20. United Nations. General Assembly 56th session. Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration; report of the Secretary-General. New York: 2001. URL http://www.un.org/milleniumgoals/index.html. [accessed on 4th September, 2006]
21. UNICEF & World Health Organization. Immunization summary 2006. New York: 2006.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




