Khalil Ullah ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Shahida Raza ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Parvez Ahmed ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Tariq Mahmood Satti ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Aamir Ikram ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Qamar-un-Nisa Chaudhry ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Muhammad Khalid Kamal ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
Farrukh Mahmood Akhtar ( Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi )
November 2007, Volume 57, Issue 11
Case Reports
Abstract
Introduction
In an area where tuberculosis (TB) is endemic, the general population is exposed to the tubercle bacillus for its whole life. However, initial host response can effectively eradicate the bacillus. Bacilli may become dormant without causing clinical disease, such that this is regarded as latent infection manifesting only by a positive tuberculin skin test.2 This latent infection can become reactivated once host immunity is low. For allo SCT recipients acquiring GVHD, the dysregulation of immune T cells would render these patients immunologically unable to defend themselves against Opportunistic infections including Mycobacterium tuberculosis.3
Pulmonary TB should be considered as a significant opportunistic infection post SCT in an endemic area. However, timely diagnosis may be difficult due to the nonspecific presentations of the disease. Therefore, a strict standardized diagnostic and monitoring strategy should be developed for the management of pulmonary TB in allo SCT recipients. A consensus for prophylactic treatment of latent pulmonary TB infection in candidates for and recipients of allo SCT should be set up as soon as possible to improve patient outcomes.4
Patient-I
Patient-II
Patient-III
A 5 years old boy with Beta Thalassaemia Major received Allo SCT from his HLA matched sibling sister in April 2002. He was transplanted after conditioning with Busulphan 3.5 mg/kg daily for four days followed by cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg daily for next 04 days. From day -2 of conditioning he received Cyclosporin (5 mg/kg daily) as prophylaxis against GVHD. Early haematological recovery (ANC >0.5 x 109/l) started on Day + 11 Post SCT. Allogeneic engraftment was confirmed from bone marrow aspiration done on Day + 21. He was discharged from the hospital on D+25 with regular follow-up in out patient department. The patient remained asymptomatic till day + 96 post SCT when he was again admitted with 03 days history of cough and high-grade fever associated with rigors with no focal sign of infection. Patient was started on Inj cefipime and amikacin. Spikes of high-grade fever continued. Repeated blood cultures and peripheral blood smears for malarial parasite were negative. The radiological examination of chest was also normal. However on clinical grounds, he was given a course of antimalarials and amphotericin B was also added in therapeurtic doses (1mg/kg daily). Repeat X-Ray chest revealed widening of mediastinum in the paratracheal region. CT scan chest also confirmed soft tissue density mass in the right paratracheal region in superior mediastinum extending to the middle mediastinum. Mediastinal tissue biopsy by mediastinostomy was carried out under G.A and tissue sent for histopathalogical examination. Sputum for direct AFB microscopy, C/S, and Fast plaque test for AFB along with blood for mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR was sent for analysis. Keeping in view the possibility of tuberculous lymphadenitis, patient was empirically put on ATT. Meanwhile patient also developed right sided pneumonic consolidation. Histopathological examination report of the mediastinal mass revealed chronic caseating granulomas. PCR for mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA was also positive. Patient's condition continued deteriorating despite treatment and died on day + 124 post SCT.
[(0)]
[(1)]
[(2)]
Patient-IV
She was put on four drug ATT. She responded very well and pleural effusion resolved completely within next 06 weeks. ATT was continued for 06 months. Thereafter she was given INH prophylaxis for next 06 months. She is now enjoying a healthy life at > 4 years post SCT.
Discussion
Tuberculosis following allo SCT has been demonstrated to be a significant problem in endemic countries with an incidence of 0.1-5.5%.4 Incidence of active tuberculosis after allo SCT has been reported in 3.1% patients from Korea.8 Similarly in Turkey, where tuberculosis is endemic, a 30-40 times higher incidence has been reported in body mass index (BMT) patients compared to general Turkish population.9 A study from Taiwan shows a trend towards increased risk of having pulmonary tuberculosis in allo SCT as compared to auto SCT (4.8+ 1.8% vs 0).4 In 2001, George B et al from Vellore India reported 1.38% and 2.2% incidence of tuberculosis in transplant recipients. However, updated data from the same centre in 2006 show 1.7% tuberculosis in transplant patients.10
Since tuberculosis is prevalent in our country, all patients and donors are screened for tuberculosis and anti tuberculosis prophylaxis is included in our transplant patients which seemed beneficial as only four patients out of 154 who underwent allo SCT. From our experience, we recommend anti-tuberculosis prophylaxis for transplant patients in other centres of our country as well as countries where this disease is prevalent.
In conclusion, rapid progression of mycobacterial infection should be considered early in the differential diagnosis of patients post BMT with unexplained fever, particularly in patients from endemic countries or with a positive family history.
References
2. Schluger NW, Rom WN. The host immune response to tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:679-91.
3. Ip MS, Yuen KY, Woo PC, Luk EK, Tsang KW, Lam WK et al. Risk factors for pulmonary tuberculosis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1173-7.
4. KU SC, Tang JL, Hsueh PR, Luh KT, Yu CJ, Yang PC. Pulmonary Tuberculosis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:1293-7.
5. Kindler T, Schindel C, Brass U, Fischer T. Fatal sepsis due to mycobacterium Tuberculosis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:217-8.
6. Hayes Lattin B, Leis JF, Maziarz RT. Isolation in the allogeneic transplant environment: how protective is it ? Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;36:373-81.
7. Fujimaki K, Maruta A, Yoshida M, Kodama F, Matsuzaki M, Fujisawa S, et al. Immune reconstitution assessed during five years after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:1275-81.
8. Lee J, Lee MH, Kim WS, Kim K, Park SH, Lee SH et al. Tuberculosis in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in Korea. Int J Hematol 2004; 79: 185-8.
9. Arslan O, Gurman G, Dilek T, Ozcan M, Koc H, IIhan O et al. Incidence of Tuberculosis after bone marrow transplantation in a single centre from Turkey. Haematologia (Budap) 1998;29:59-62.
10. George B, Mathews V, Srivastava V, Srivastava A, Chandy M. Tuberculosis among allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients in India. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:973-5.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




