Tariq Ashraf ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Syed Ishtiaq Rasool ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Tahir Saghir ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Syed Nadeem Hassan Rizvi ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Nadeem Qamar ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Khan Shah Zaman ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Mohammad Ishaque ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
Asadullah Kundi ( Catheterization Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi. )
July 2007, Volume 57, Issue 7
Original Article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Forty patients were selected for the study, 20 were assigned to the thrombus aspiration (TA) group and 20 tothe standard PCI (SPCI) group. In the final analysis three cases were excluded from the TA group (two cases of saphenous venous graft and one case of rescue angioplasty).The baseline characteristics of the two groups are shown in Table 1. The two groups were similar with regard sto age, gender, risk factors, site of MI, severity of the stenosis and vessels involved. The pre-intervention TIMI flow grade was the same in both groups with all the patient shaving 0 or 1 TIMI flow grade. The post-intervention TIMIflow grade was significantly improved for the thrombus aspiration group (p = 0.009), 13 out of 17 in the TA grouphad improved TIMI flow grade of 3 while only 6 out of 20in the SPCI group had improved flow grade of 3.Table 2 shows that the procedural characteristics regarding angiographic success, procedure time, number ofstents and total stent length were the same for both thegroups. The MBG was the same for both the groups at pre-intervention, while was significantly improved for the TA group after intervention (p = 0.001), 13 (75%) out of 17 had
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Standard PCI and PCI with Thrombus Aspiration Export Catheter.
| Variable | Thrombus Aspiration (n=17) | Standard PCI (n=20) | p-value |
| Age (Years) | 50+5.3 | 50.3+5.6 | 0.87 |
| Gender: | |||
| Males | 13(76%) | 16(80%) | |
| Females | 4(24%) | 4(20%) | 0.89 |
| Risk Factors: | |||
| Hypertension | 9(53%) | 8(40%) | 0.43 |
| Diabetes | 4(53%) | 4(20%) | 0.89 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 11 (65%) | 14(70%) | 0.73 |
| Family History of IHD | 6(35%) | 7(35%) | 0.99 |
Variable
Angiographic Success (%) Procedure time (min) (mean + sd) Number of Stents per Lesion Total Stent Length (mm) (mean +sd) Slow flow (%) Myocardial Blush Grade (Pre-Intervention):
0 1 2 3 Myocardial Blush Grade (Post-Intervention):
0 1 2 3 ST Segment Resolution: > 70% (%) < 70% (%)
I []Thrombus Aspimdon •Standard PCI
MBG<2andSTR40% *MBG>20rSTR>70% MBG>2&STR>70%
Figure. Distribution of Patients According to the Combination of MBG and STR Showing Improved Outocme in the Thrombus Aspiration Group. * P-Value = 0.017.
MBG of 2 or more as compared to only 4 out of 20 in the SPCI group. The ST Segment resolution was the same in both groups (p = 0.16).
The outcome criteria were evaluated after combining MBG and ST resolution (STR) for the two groups. MBG > 2 and STR of > 70% were considered to be favourable (Figure 1). It was seen that 8 (47%) out of 17 patients in the TA group had improvements in both MBG and STR as compared to only 2 (10%) of 20 patients in the SPCI group.
| Thrombus Aspiration (n=17) | Standard PCI (n=20) | p-value |
| 17(100%) | 19 (95%) | 0.35 |
| 35+ 11 | 45.5+ 19 | 0.16 |
| 1+0 | 1.2+0.4 | |
| 16.8±6 | 20.2±7.9 | 0.15 |
| 1 (6%) | 11 (55%) | 0.001 |
| 11 (65%) | 14(70%) | |
| 6 (35%) | 6 (30%) | 0.73 |
| 0- | 0- | - |
| 0- | 0- | - |
| 0 - | 7(35%) | |
| 4(23%) | 9(45%) | |
| 12 (65%) | 3 (25%) | 0.001 |
| 1 (35%) | 2(5%) | |
| 8(47%) | 5 (25%) | 0.16 |
| 9(53%) | 15 (75%) |
Another 5 (29%) out of 17 patients in the TA group hadimprovement in either MBG or STR as compared to 5(25%) out of 20 patents in the SPCI group. The two criteria combined showed a significantly better outcome for TAgroup (p = 0.017) (Figure).
Discussion
References
American Heart Association. Cardiovascular Disease Statistics, 2006. (Accessed December 7, 2006, at http://www.americanheart.org)
Hafizullah M, Hassan M, Iqbal Z. Primary Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction. J. Postgrad. Med.Inst 2001;15:117-25.
Topol EJ, Yadav JS: Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 2000; 101; 570-80.
4. Murakami T, Mizuno S, Takahashi Y, Ohsato K, Moriuchi I, Arai Y et al Intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82; 839-44.
Wang HJ, Kao HL, Liau CS, LecYT. Export aspiration Catheter thrombosuction before actual angioplasty in primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction Catheter Cardiovasc interv 2002; 57; 332-9.
6. The thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. The TIMI study group. N Eng. J. Mod 1985; 312: 932 - 6.
7. Van't HofAW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zajistra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study group. Circulation 1998;97:2302-6.
Cannon CP. Importance of TIMI3 flow. Circulation 2001;104:624-6.
9. Roe MT, Ohman EM, MaasAC, Christenson RH, Mahaffey KW, Gronger CB et al. Shifting the open artery hyprothesis down stream: The quest for optimal reperfusion. J.Am Coll. Cardiol 2001:37:9-18.
10. Wang FW, Ohman A, Otero J, Stouffer GA, Waxman S, Afzal A et al. Distal
myocardial protection during percutaneous coronary intervention with an intracoronary beta-blocker. Circulation 2003;107:2914-9.
11. Taniyama Y, Ito H. Iwakura K, Masuyama T, Hori M, Takiuchi S et al. Beneficial effects of intracoronary verapamil on microvascular and myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J.Am Coll. Cardiol 1997:30:1193-9.
12. Marzilli M, Orsini E, Marraccini P, Testa R. Beneficial effects of intracoronary adenosine as adjunct to primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:2154-9.
13. Vijayalakshmi K, Whittaker VJ, Kunadian B, Graham RJ, Wright RA, Hall JA et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial to study the effect of intracoronary injection of verapamil and adenosine on coronary blood flow during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Heart 2006; 92:1272-84.
14. Constantinides S, LoTS, Been M, Shin ME Early experience with a helical coronary thrombectomy device in patients with acute coronary thrombosis. Heart 2002;87;455-60.
15. Cura F, L Allier PL, Kapadia SR, Houghtaling PL, Dipaola LM, Ellis SG et al. Predictors and prognosis of suboptimal coronary blood flow after primary coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol 2001;88:124-8.
16. Angelin A, Rubartelli P, Mistrodgo F, Barbera DM, Abbadessa F, Vischi M et al. Distal protection with a filter device during coronary stenting in patients with stable and unstable angina. Circulation 2004;110:515-21.
17. Henriques J, Zijlstra F, Van't HofA, de Boer MJ, Dambrink JH, Gosselink M et al Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade. Circulation 2003;107:2115-9.
18. Grube E, Gerckens U, Young A, Rowold S, Kirchhof N, Sedgewick J et al.. Prevention of distal embolization during coronary angioplasty in Saphenous Vein grafts and native vessels using porous filter protection. Circulation 2001;104:2436-41.
19. Napodano M, Pasquetto G, Sacca S, Cernetti C, Scarbeo V, Pascotto P et al. Intracroronary thombectomy improves myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 2003; 42: 1395 - 1402.
20. Burzotta F, Trani C, Romagnoli E, Mazzari MA, Rebuzzi AG, De Vita M et al. Manual Thrombus Aspiration improves Myocardial reperfusion. The randomized Evaluation of the effect of Mechanical Reduction of distal embolization by thrombus- aspiration in primary and rescue Angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial. JACC 2005; 46: 371-6.
21. Stone GW, Webb J, Cox DA, Brodie BR, Qureshi M; KalynyehA et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutanuous coronary intervention in acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293: 1063-72.
22. Ferrante G Burzotta F, Fadda G Analysis of material aspirated using the Diver CE and myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Ital Heart J 2004; 5 Suppl: 39S.
23. Exaire JE, Brener SJ, Ellis SG Yadav JS, Bhatt DL. Guide Wire Emboli protection device is associated with improved myocardial perfusion grade in Saphenous vein graft intervention. Am. Heart J 2004: 148; 1003 - 6.
24. Khan A, Tayyab F, Bashir R, Haq M, Raja K, Yousaf M. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. PakArmed Forces Mod J 1997;47:77-83.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




