By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

November 2020, Volume 70, Issue 11

Research Article

Epidemiological and immunological study of nasal polyposis among allergic patients in Babylon province: Cross-sectional study

Habeeb Shuhaib Ahmmed  ( Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Kufa University, Najaf, Iraq )
Suaad Mohammed Rasheed  ( Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Medicine, Kufa University, Najaf, Iraq )
Rana Fadhil Obaid  ( Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Medicine, Kufa University, Najaf, Iraq )
Safaa Hussain Alturaih  ( Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq )
Rasha Fadhil Obaid  ( Department of Anesthesia Techniques, Al Mustaqbal University College, Babylon, Iraq. )

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of nasal polyposis among allergic patients, and to investigate the impact of polyposis on allergic inflammatory markers.

Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2018 to January 2019 at the Asthma and Allergy Centre, Babylon, Iraq, and comprised patients aged 15-71 years with allergic asthma and or allergic rhinitis. The patients were divided into two groups; A with nasal polyposis, and B without nasal polyposis. Other than demographical data, total serum immuglobulin E, and blood eosinophil percentage were collected. Data was analysed using SPSS 22.

Results:Of the 240 patients, 81(33.8%) were in group A, and 159(66.2%) were in group B. The overall mean age of the sample was 35.9±13.8 years. The overall mean immunoglobulin E level was 221±141 and the mean peripheral eosinophil percentage was 4±1.68. Prevalence of nasal polyposis increased with age (p<0.05), but was not affected by gender or residency (p>0.05). The markers increased significantly in the presence of polyposis in patients with respiratory allergy (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Nasal polyposis was found to be highly prevalent in patients with respiratory allergy and the combined presence of these two diseases caused additional increment in allergic markers.

Keywords: Nasal polyposis, Allergy, Asthma, Allergic rhinitis. (JPMA 70: 1975; 2020)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.64913

 

Introduction

 

Respiratory allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity reaction of the respiratory mucosal lining for inhaled allergens, with prevalence ranging 10-20%. The annual incidence of respiratory allergy was reported in the United States to be 20-40 million,1 while in the middle east, including Iraq, it has been found to have increased from 9% to 38% which is becasuse of modern lifestyle that is more urbanised.2 Clinical manifestations of respiratory allergy are the results of series of events that involve both immunological and biochemical aspects that are triggered by the inhalation of respiratory allergy involving type 1 IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Development of respiratory allergy is influenced by different factors, like genetic makeup of the individual and environmental exposure to respiratory allergens and other environmental irritants.3 Nasal polyposis (NP) arises from mucosal lining of the nose and paranasal sinuses. NP is characterised histologically by epithelial layer proliferation, hyperplasia of the mucus secreting glands, increased basement membrane thickness, oedema, and foci of fibrosis with stromal cellular infiltration. Paucity of the epidemiological studies and variation in the methods of identification and recording of NP, including case history, simple rhinoscopic examination, nasal endoscopic assessment and/ or advanced imaging studies like computed tomography (CT) scanning, make it difficult to have an assessment of the accurate NP prevalence in the general population. NP is a disease with overall prevalence of about 2-4%, and this figure is affected by the age of the participants in a study. The exact aetiology of NP is still unknown and there are different theories that have tried to explain the formation of NP, like allergy, role of infection, abnormality of nasal autonomic nervous system, polysaccharide abnormality and enzyme abnormality.4 Although NP is not a fatal disease, it can adversely affect the quality of life of the sufferers. NP is a clinical condition that can be treated by both medical and surgical means, and, commonly, both modalities of treatments are required for optimum outcome. NP is characterised by high rate of recurrence even after endoscopic sinus surgery, with the recurrence rate reaching 40% within six months following surgery.5 There is a controversy about the association between allergy and NP. The current study was planned to assess the prevalence of NP in allergic patients, and to evaluate the impact of NP on inflammatory allergy markers, including peripheral eosinophil count and total serum IgE.

 

Patients and Methods

 

The cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2018 to January 2019 at the Asthma and Allergy Centre (AAC), Babylon, Iraq. After approval from the ethics review committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Iraq, the sample size was calculated using the equation: N=Z1-α/2 2P(1-p)/d2. In the equation, N was the sample size, Z1-α/2 was the standard normal variate (at 5% type 1 error p<0.05), P was the expected proportion in population based on previous studies, and d was precision.6 The prevalence was assumed to be 10% according to the findings reported earlier7 and the power of study was kept at 80%. The study population was selected by simple random sampling from allergic patients attending the AAC. Their names were arranged in a list and chosen by using random digit table. The sample was raised from among patients aged 15-71 years with bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, or both. After taking informed consent from the patients, allergic rhinitis was diagnosed according to the guidelines provided by the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) initiative,8 while asthma was diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) using history and pulmonary function tests.9 History and clinical examination by physician was undertaken for all the participants and all had sensitivity to at least one of the common allergens that are routinely tested at AAC, like pollens, including five grasses, bermuda, plantain, tree I, tree II, tree III, chenopodium and mugwort, mouldsas, including mould I alternaria, mould II cladosporium, mould III penicillium), mould IV aspergillus, and candida, mites, including dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and dermatophagoides farina. These were tested using percutaneous skin tests with glycerine preservative extracts (Staller Genes SA–France). Other inhalant allergens such, as house dust mites (HDM) genus glyciphagus and date pollen were also tested with intradermal skin tests (Allergy Vaccine Lab., Iraq). Patients treated by antihistamines and systemic oral steroids over the preceding two weeks and thjose with other inflammatory diseases and helminths infestation were excluded. Nasal endoscopy was done by an ear nose, throat (ENT) specialist to confirm the presence or absence of NP. The patients were divided into two groups; A with NP, and B without NP. Total serum IgE was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Call biotech, US) and, according to the instructions of the manufacturer, IgE level was considered to be elevated at >100IU/ml. Eosinophil count in peripheral blood was detected by CELLDYN Ruby System (Abbott Diagnostics, US). Reference ranges for eosinophil percentage in normal adults is 1–6% of the total peripheral blood white blood cell count (WBC), according to the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) 2010 guidelines.10 Data was analysed using SPSS 22. Descriptive statistics were done, using frequencies and percentages for qualitative data, and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for quantitative variables. Chi-square test was used to compare demographic information between the groups while t test was used to compare the mean values. P≤0.05 was considered significant.

 

Results

 

Of the 240 patients, 81(33.8%) were in group A, and 159(66.2%) were in group B. The overall mean age of the sample was 35.9±13.8 years. Of the total, 117(48.8%) were with allergic rhinitis, 42(17.5%) with allergic asthma and 81(33.8%) with both asthma and rhinitis. The mean IgE level was 221±141 and the mean peripheral eosinophil count was 4±1.68. NPwas present in 24(29.6%) cases each of asthma and allergic rhinitis, and in 33(40.7%) patients who had both asthma and rhinitis (Table 1).

There was significant difference between age and the presence of NP (p=0.046), while no significant difference was found with respect to gender and patient residency (p>0.05) (Table 2).

The mean IgE level and mean peripheral eosinophil count in allergic patients with NP were significantly greater than those in allergic patients without NP (Table 3).

 

Discussion

 

The current study showed high prevalence of NP among allergic patients and the findings are similar to those reported earlier.11-13 In contrast, a study14 in Greece recorded prevalence of about 4%, while another7 reported 10% prevalence of NP in asthmatic patients. The high prevalence of NP in our patients may be explained by environmental factors2 like the dusty climate of the country that helps to transport airborne allergens, especially fungi, which aggravate allergic attacks accompanied by irritation to nasal mucosa and release more allergic inflammatory mediators participating in polyps formation. Additionally, frequent upper respiratory tract infections may be another aggravating factor. Results showed no significant difference between the genders in terms of NP, which is line with some studies12 and in contrast with others15 which demonstrated male domination. Prevalence of NP increased with age in the current study which was also reported earlier.12,13,16 Also, there was no difference in the prevalence of NP according to patient’s dwelling in either urban or rural areas, and this was in agreement with an earlier study.17 The current study found higher levels of peripheral eosinophilia to be the most important allergic inflammatory marker in the presence of polyposis, and this finding matched the results reported earlier.18,19 Some studies found that eosinophil count was high not just in the blood of allergic patients with polyps, but they were also significantly higher in nasal mucosal tissues of atopic patients with polyps.20 In the current study the mean total serum IgE was significantly higher in patients with polyposis than those suffering from allergy alone. Similar result was reported by a study.21 Another study22 found that serum levels of IgE and eosinophil were significantly higher in patients with allergy and NP, and a more recent study23 demonstrated that atopic chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients were characterised by increased eosinophil accumulation which leads to eosinophilic inflammation characterised by elevated interleukin-5 (IL-5), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and total IgE. However, in contrast to the above results, one study19 demonstrated no correlation between total IgE levels and mucosal disease based on computed tomography (CT). Results of the current study confirmed the eosinophilmediated inflammatory nature of NP that has been demonstrated by earlier studies23,24 as eosinophils constitute the hallmark of polyps as a result of granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-5 action, which function to prolong eosinophil life. Also, polyps contain adhesion molecules that cause eosinophil extravasation.23,24 Elevation in eosinophil and total IgE could be explained by the supposition of many researchers who illustrated that proteins derived from different pathogens like bacteria and viruses are implicated to act as super-antigen that cause stimulation of B cells, mast cells and basophils, leading to activation of antibody-mediated immune response, with class-switching to IgE. The most important super-antigen is staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) and the way anti-staphylococcus aurous enterotoxins IgE present nearly in half of polyposis epithelial tissue sections.25 The local inflammatory disease of upper airways, like NP, influences systemically on inflammatory mediators and add to the burden on allergic patients by increasing the coexisting inflammatory processes as they already suffer from high level of eosinophil and IgE owing to mast cell triggering and degranulation and T-helper cell-2 (Th2) lymphocytes activation,21,25 therefore the synergic effect of these two diseases will tend to worsen one another as concomitant occurrence of NP in allergic patients cause longer and severe nasal symptoms and prominent sinus radiological changes.22 Equally, degree of severity in patients with allergic asthma is associated with radiological severity of nasal mucosal disease like polyposis.26 In the light of the findings, we recommend that nasal polyposis should be considered a common comorbid disease in allergic patients. Besides, patients with respiratory allergy, weather allergic rhinitis and or allergic asthma, should be routinely screened by endoscopic nasal examination for the presence of polyps to ensure appropriate management in those patients.

 

Conclusion

 

Nasal polyposis was found to be highly prevalent in patients with respiratory allergy and the combined presence of these two diseases caused increment in levels of allergic markers.

 

Disclaimer: None.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Source of Funding: None.

 

References

 

1. Small P., Keith, P.K. & Kim, H. Allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma.ClinImmunol. 2018;14, 51.

2. Goron folahL. Aeroallergens, atopy and allergic rhinitis in the Middle East. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol.2015;Vol 48, N 1, 5-21

3. Kawa A, Amin M.Allergic Respiratory Inflammation and Remodeling. Turk Thorac J.2015;16: 133–40.

4. Saitoh T, Kusunoki T, Yao T, Kawano K, Kojima Y, Miyahara K, et al. Relationship between epithelial damage or basement membrane thickness and eosino-philicinfiltration in nasal polyps with chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology.2009;47:275-79.

5. Adam S, DeConde, Jess C, Mace, Joshua M, Jeremiah A, et al. Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Laryngoscope. 2017;127: 550– 55.

6. Jaykaran C, Tamoghna B. How to Calculate Sample Size for Different Study Designs in Medical Research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35: 121–26.

7. Braunstahl GJ, Fokkens W. Nasal involvement in allergic asthma. Allergy 2003;58:1235–43.

8. Bousquet J, Hellings PW, Agache I, Amat F, Annesi-Maesano I, Ansotegui IJ, et al.Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Phase 4 (2018): Change management in allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using mobile technology.J Allergy ClinImmunol.2019 Mar;143(3):864-879. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.049. Epub 2018 Sep 29

9. Global Initiative for asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; 2002.

10. The Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy(ASCIA). (2010).Tests in the Diagnosis of Allergic Diseases. Website : www. allergy. org.au. accessed on12/4/2019.

11. Jovicevic J, Kljajic V. Nasal polyposis and allergic rhinitis-our experience. SrpArhCelokLek.2005;133:105-107.

12. Ahmadiafshar A, Farjid HR,Moezzi,N.Nasal polyposis in patients with asthmaand allergic rhinitis.J Laryngol Otol. 2012; 126: 780-83.

13. LiQC, Cheng KJ, Wang F, Zhou SH.Role of atopy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: does an atopic condition affect the severity and recurrence of disease?. J Laryngol Otol. 2016130:640-44.

14. Grigoreas N, Vourdas D, Petalas K, Simeonidis G, DemeroutisI, Tsioulos I.Nasal polyposis in patients with rhinitis andasthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2002;23:169–74.

15. Toledano M A, HerraizP C, NavasM C, Garcia S M, Navarro C M, Galindo AN. Epidemiological study in patients with nasal polyposis. ActaOtorrinolaringolEsp 2008;59:438–43.

16. Klossek JM, Neukirch F, Pribil C, Jankowski R, Serrano E,Chanal I et al.Prevalence of nasal polyposis in France: across-sectional, case control study. Allergy 2005;60:233–37.

17. Rugina M, Serrano E, Klossek JM, Crampette L, Stoll D, Bebear JP, et al.Epidemiological and clinical aspects of nasal polyposis in France; the ORLI group experience. Rhinology 2002;40:75-9.

18. Erbek SS1, Erbek S, Topal O, Cakmak O.The role of allergy in the severity of nasal polyposis.Am J Rhinol. 2007;21:686-90.

19. Sheri A, Poznanovic MD, Todd T, Kingdom, MD.TotalIgE Levels and Peripheral Eosinophilia:Correlation With Mucosal Disease Based on- ComputedTomographic Imaging of the ParanasalSinus.ArchOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:701-4.

20. Perić1A, VojvodićD, Vukomanović-ĐurđevićB. Influence of allergy on clinical, immunological and histological characteristics of nasal polyposis. B-ENT. 2012; 8: 25-32.

21. Scavuzzo MC, Fattori B, Ruffoli R, RocchiV, Carpi A, BerniR, et al. Inflamatory mediators andeosinophilia in atopic and non-atopic patients with nasalpolyposis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2005;59:323-29.

22. Staikūnienė, SauliusVaitkus, LidijaMarijaJapertiene, SilvijaRyškiene. chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma:clinical and radiological features, allergy and inflammation markers.Medicina (Kaunas). 2008 ; 44:257-63.

23. Luo Ba, Jintao Du, FengLiu,Fenglin Yang, Miaomiao Han, Sixi Liu, etal. Distinct inflammatory profiles in atopic and nonatopic patients with chronic rhinosinustisaccompanied by nasal polyps inWesternChina. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res.2015;7:346-58.

24. Van Zele T, Claeys S, Gevaert P, Van Maele G, HoltappelsG,Van- Cauwenberge P, et al. Differentiation of chronic sinus diseases by measurement of inflammatory markers. Allergy 2006;61:1280-89.

25. LicariA., CaimmiS., BosaL., MarsegliaA., MarsegliaandG.L, CaimmiD. Rhinosinusitisandasthma: A verylong Engagment. Int. J. Immunopatbol. Pharmacol. 2014; 27: 499-8 .

26. Pearlman AN, Chandra RK, Chang D, Conley DB, Tripathi-Peters A, Grammer LC, et al. Relationships between severity of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis, asthma, and atopy. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2009; 23:145-48.

 

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: