By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

December 2005, Volume 55, Issue 12

Letter to the Editor

Type 2 Diabetes and Risk of Osteoporosis

Madam, Are type 2 diabetics at greater risk of osteoporosis? Which amongst them need to be screened? The relationship between the effect of diabetes mellitus on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) has remained controversial, with reports of elevated 1,2 decreased 3 or unaltered4 bone mineral density. More recent research has suggested that underlying insulin resistance may even be protective to bone. 5 What is the BMD of our diabetic population? Is it any different than that of non diabetics? In an attempt to answer this question we examined BMD in 50 diabetic patients and 50 controls. Both the cases and controls were over the age of 45 years. The groups were enrolled between October 2002 and January 2003. Information was gathered regarding demographics, diabetic status and duration, menopausal status in women, previous history of fractures or osteoporosis, level of physical activity and smoking status. Those with history of glucocorticoid use and use of HRT and dietary calcium supplementations were excluded. BMI (body mass index) and WHR (waist hip ratios) were recorded and BMD was calculated by the Sahara clinical bone sonometer. This measures the calcaneal (heel) bone mineral density in g/cm 2 by ultrasound parameters. The output was expressed as a T score and as an estimate of BMD in g/cm 2 of the calcaneus as measured by DEXA. The two groups were matched in terms of age, male:female ratio, BMI and WHR. Mean duration of diabetes was 11. 1 years in the study group. Women were matched with respect to menopausal status. Previous history fracture was greater in the diabetic group when compared with controls (18% and 10% respectively) though not statistically significant. We found that our diabetic population had higher BMD (0.461 + 0.102 g/cm2 vs 0.434 + 0.1186 g/cm and t-scores -0.972 + 0.9852 vs -1.27 + 1.066). And there was a significantly higher prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the control population (p<0.025). In our small group of patients, those with type 2 diabetes had better BMD than controls. We suggest that larger well designed studies are conducted to examine and validate this finding. Is the improved BMD an effect of oral antidiabtic agents, exogenous insulin or underlying insulin resistance will require further investigation.

Aasima Yawar, Lubna M. Zuberi,
Naeem ul Haque
Diabetes and Endocrinology Section,
Department of Medicine,
The Aga Khan University Hospital,
Karachi, Pakistan.

References

1.Barrett-Connor E, Holbrook T L. Sex differences in osteoporosis in older adults with non insulin dependant diabetes. JAMA 1992;268:3333-7.
2.Bauer DC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, Orwoll ES, Scott JC, Black DM, et al. Factors associated with appendicular bone mass in older women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research group. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:657-65.
3.Levin ME, Boisseau VC, Avioli LV. Effects of diabetes mellitus on bone mass in juvenille and adult onset diabetes. N Eng J Med 1976;294:241-5.
4.Giaccia A, Fassina A, Caviezel F, Cattaneo AG, Caldirola G, Pozza G, et al. Bone mineral density in diabetes mellitus. Bone 1998;9:29-36.
5.Weinstock RS, Goland RS, Shane E, Clemens TL, Lindsay R, Bilezikian JP, et al. Bone mineral density in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Bone Mineral Res 1989;4:97-101.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: