Sidra Dil Muhammad  ( Department of General Surgery, Government THQ Hospital Sabzazar, Lahore, Pakistan. )
Muhammad Saad Faisal  ( Department of General Surgery, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan. )
Mohammad Akmal Shafiq  ( Department of General Surgery, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Rahbar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan. )
Muhammad Rizwan Saeed  ( Department of General Surgery, Government THQ Hospital Sabzazar, Lahore, Pakistan. )

Objective: To determine the incidence of surgical site infection following open hernioplasty, and to compare the infection rate among ventral and groin hernia repairs.

 

Method: The retrospective study was conducted from April 2 to November 30, 2021, at the Government Tehsil Headquarter Hospital Sabzazar, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data form June 2018 to December 2020 of patients with ventral abdominal and groin hernia. All patients underwent hernioplasty by a single consultant surgeon and were discharged within 2 days of surgery. Surgical-site infections were recorded on follow-up visits up to 30 days of operation, and were compared between ventral and groin hernia cases. Data was analysed using SPSS 22.

 

Results: Of the 218 patients with mean age 37.07±4.94 years, 117(53.67%) were males, 108(49.54%) smokers and 127(58.25%) hypertensive, while 110(50.45%) had ventral abdominal hernia and 108(49.54%) had groin hernias. Mean operative time and mean hospital stay were 56.53±6.20 minutes and 3.06±1.31days, respectively. Mean wound drainage in abdominal hernia cases was 8.99±2.02 days. Surgical site infection incidence following open hernioplasty was 2(0.91%). Infection rate among ventral abdominal and groin hernioplasty were 1(0.90%) and 1(0.92%) (p=0.50).

 

Conclusion: Incidence of surgical site infection following open hernioplasty showed no significant difference between ventral abdominal and groin hernia repairs.

 

Key Words: Surgical site infection, Hernioplasty, Groin hernia.

 

(JPMA 73: 1241; 2023) DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.6379

 

Submission completion date: 24-02-2022— Acceptance date: 09-02-2023

 

Introduction

 

Hernia repair is a recognised surgical procedure worldwide.^1,2 In every country, either developed, developing or underdeveloped, this procedure is well-known in the general population and risk of its wound infection is always debatable among surgeons.^3,4 Approximately, 31% of all hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are surgical-site infections (SSIs).^5-9 Prolonged morbidity and mortality are the consequences of SSIs. Stated mortality rate due to SSI is 3%.^10-14 SSI is an escapable wound complication that is why it is critical to determine the incidence and to identify the causative agents to avoid this dreadful complication.^15,16

Repair of hernia is one of the clean surgical procedures and is commonly used as a reference to appraise operation room (OR) quality of any medical setup, and a surgeon`s operative technique by assessing the rate of SSI.¹⁷ Several techniques of hernia repair and mesh varieties are in practice these days. Repairing hernia with non-absorbable mesh in open surgery is the familiar technique. Use of mesh in hernia repair significantly shrinks the risk of hernia recurrence, and this is the main reason that patients and surgeons show preference for it. However, the associated SSI risk with the mesh is every surgeon’s nightmare.^18,19

Studies have reported varying SSI incidence following hernioplasty, ranging from 0.45% to 14.5%.^20,21-23

The current study was planned to determine SSI incidence following open hernioplasty, and to compare the infection rate among ventral and groin hernia repairs.

 

Patients and Methods

 

The retrospective study was conducted from April 2 to November 30, 2021, at the Government Tehsil Headquarter (THQ) Hospital Sabzazar, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data form June 2018 to December 2020. After approval from the institutional ethics review committee, data of patients of either gender aged 18-80 years with ventral abdominal and groin hernia. Data of patient having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade III and IV, body mass index (BMI) > 35kg/m2 and obstructed ventral abdominal or groin hernias were excluded because the THQ hospital did not have facilities for high-risk patient management Patients’ demographic and perioperative data was collected. All patients underwent open hernioplasty for ventral and groin hernias with standard sized nonabsorbable polypropylene mesh (fixed with Prolene 3/0) (Figures 1-2)

 

 

 

by a single consultant surgeon under general/spinal anaesthesia. In ventral abdominal hernias, mesh was positioned above the rectus sheath. The only technique for mesh placement was utilised because the approach is technically least challenging, and common amongst junior surgeons for the repair of ventral abdominal hernias. A subcutaneous suction drain (Redivac No. 18) was placed in all hernias except groin hernias. Patients after ventral abdominal hernia repair were discharged within 2 days of surgery with drain, and patients with groin hernia repair were discharged on the next day of surgery. Intravenous (IV) antibiotics (Augmentin 1.2gm STAT) were administered preoperatively to all patients. Clinical examination was done by the surgeon for localised pain or tenderness, localised swelling, erythema and purulent drainage in the operative wound with or without fever (>38°C) on follow-up visits up to 30 days of operation to keep track of SSIs.

Data was analysed using SPSS 22. Quantitative data was presented as means and standard deviations, while qualitative data was presented as frequencies and percentages. SSI incidence was compared between ventral abdominal and groin hernia cases using Fisher's exact test of independence. Mean values were compared using student's t-test. Data was stratified for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, hepatitis C infection, hernia type and clinical presentation to address the effect modifier. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

Results

 

Of the 218 patients with mean age 37.07±4.94 years, 117(53.67%) were males, and 108(49.54%) were smokers, while 110(50.45%) had ventral abdominal hernia and 108(49.54%) had groin hernias. The commonest presentation was inguinal hernia 104(47.7%), followed by paraumbilical hernia 64(29.3%), umbilical hernia 18(8.2%), epigastric hernia 17(7.7%), incisional hernia 11(5%), recurrent inguinal 3(1.3%) and femoral hernia 1(0.4%). There were 149(68.3%) patients with irreducible and 69(31.6%) with reducible hernias on clinical examination. Longer duration of symptoms (≥1 year) was recorded in 173(79.3%) patients. Majority of patients were hypertensive 127(58.2%), followed by diabetes 54(24.7%) and hepatitis C infection 42(19.2%). Mean BMI, TLC (Total Leukocyte Count) and (Blood Glucose Level) were 31.16±1.01kg/m2, 7.42±2.05×109/L and 119.07±8.79mg/dL, respectively. Mean operative time and mean hospital stay were 56.53±6.20 minutes and 3.06±1.31days, respectively. Mean wound drainage in abdominal hernia cases was 8.99±2.02 days. SSI incidence following open hernioplasty was 2(0.91%); 1(0.90%) in ventral abdominal and 1(0.92%) in groin hernioplasty (p=0.50). Abscess drainage or mesh removal was not required in any infected case (Table).

 

 

Discussion

 

Most of the patients in the current study belonged to the middle age group 37.07±4.94 years, which is in line with earlier studies²⁰.

The male-to-female ratio in the study was 1.1:1, while male dominance has been reported in a study²⁰. In the current study, male patients mostly showed up with inguinal hernia and were interested in getting their hernia fixed as soon as possible. The females came up with abdominal wall hernias and they had deliberately postponed their hernia surgery because of the fear of postoperative infertility.

The patients in the current study had BMI 31.16±1.01kg/m2 which is much higher than 25.4±2.93kg/m2 recorded earlier²⁰. Hypertension, diabetes and hepatitis C infection were the major comorbidities, while the earlier study²⁰ reported hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes. There were 49.5% smokers compared to 25.9% reported earlier²⁰. This may be because in Pakistan, 20% of adults smoke cigarettes.²⁴

Mean duration of surgery was 56.53±6.20 minutes compared to >60 minutes in 55.7% cases reported earlier20. All patients in the study were given preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis compared to 80.7% of patients in a study²⁰.

SSI incidence following open hernioplasty was 0.9% in the study, which was much lower than 7.7% reported by Pardhan et al²⁰. The infection rate among ventral abdominal hernia and groin hernia mesh repairs was almost equal; 0.90% and 0.92% (p=0.50), respectively. An earlier study reported SSI rate of 0.45% in groin hernia cases and 2.37% in ventral abdominal hernia repair.²². Sharma et al.4 reported a higher incidence of SSI in groin hernia compared to ventral abdominal hernia (7.8% vs. 0.0%). Malik et al.²⁵ and Jawaid et al.²⁶ also reported higher SSI rates of 18% and 11.4% in inguinal hernia repair.

The current study found that the incidence of SSI for ventral abdominal hernioplasty was detected higher in females (1.1%), middle age group (1.3%), diabetics (2.4%), normotensive (1.0%), hepatitis C-infected (3.8%), non-smokers (1.1%), patients with paraumbilical hernia (1.5%), patients with longer duration of symptoms (1.1%) and patients with irreducible hernia (0.9%). However, the results were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Incidence of SSI for groin hernioplasty was found greater among males (1.0%), middle age group (1.5%), non-diabetics (1.0%), hypertensive (2.7%), smokers (1.2%), inguinal hernia (0.9%), patients with longer duration (≥1 year) of symptoms (1.1%) and patients with reducible groin hernias (1.5%). However, the results were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Pardhan et al.20 found SSIs more in patients with irreducible hernia (63%), smokers (62%), diabetics (12.5%), asthmatics (12.5%) and patients with chronic liver disease (12.5%). Mean operative time, mean hospital stay and wound drainage showed no significant difference between ventral abdominal and groin hernias in the current study.

One explanation of low SSI rate in the study is that all surgeries were performed by a consultant surgeon, while in another study20,23% operations were performed by residents and 77% by consultants. Other potential explanations of low SSI rate in our study are case selection (ASA I-II, BMI <35kg/m2, elective procedures, normal TLC), optimisation of patient (control of blood sugar level) before surgery, preoperative antibiotics prophylaxis for all patients, mesh configuration according to hernial defect magnitude in ventral abdominal hernias, shorter duration of surgery (<60min.), postoperative IV antibiotics during hospital stay, adequate wound drainage (8.99±2.02 days) in ventral abdominal hernias and regular follow-ups.

The limitations of the current study include the fact that it was done at a single centre study and all surgeries were conducted by a single experienced surgeon.

 

Conclusion

 

SSI incidence following open hernioplasty was low and there was no significant difference of infection rates between cases of ventral abdominal and groin hernia mesh repairs.

 

Disclaimer: None.

 

Conflict of Interest: None.

 

Source of Funding: None.

 

References

 

1.      Tastaldi L, Petro CC, Krpata DM, Alkhatib H, Fafaj A, Tu C, et al. History of surgical site infection increases the odds for a new infection after open incisional hernia repair. Surgery 2019; 166: 88-93.

2.      Park H, de Virgilio C, Kim DY, Shover AL, Moazzez A. Effects of smoking and different BMI cutoff points on surgical site infection after elective open ventral hernia repair. Hernia 2021; 25: 337-43.

3.      Yang H, Xiong Y, Chen J, Shen Y. Study of mesh infection management following inguinal hernioplasty with an analysis of risk factors: a 10-year experience. Hernia 2020; 24: 301-5.

4.      Sharma M, Bittu R, Garg K, Sehra H, Kewalramani S. Prevalence of Post-operative Surgical site infection in a district Hospital of western Rajasthan India. Int Multispecialty J Health 2017; 3: 59-63

5.      Plymale MA, Davenport DL, Walsh-Blackmore S, Hess J, Griffiths WS, Plymale MC, et al. Costs and complications associated with infected mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect 2020; 21: 344-39.

6.      Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN, Friis-Andersen H, Helgstrand F. Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short-and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 526-32.

7.      Heniford BT, Ross SW, Wormer BA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Colavita PD, et al. Preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: a decade long prospective observational study with analysis of 1023 patient outcomes. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 364-74.

8.      Warren J, Desai SS, Boswell ND, Hancock BH, Abbad H, Ewing JA, et al. Safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230: 405-13.

9.      Sereysky J, Parsikia A, Stone ME, Castaldi M, McNelis J. Predictive factors for the development of surgical site infection in adults undergoing initial open inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2020; 24: 173-8.

10.    Ramos RD, O’Brien WJ, Gupta K, Itani KM. Incidence and risk factors for long-term mesh explantation due to infection in more than 100,000 hernia operation patients. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 232: 872-80.

11.    Hassan Z, Nisiewicz MJ, Ueland W, Plymale MA, Plymale MC, Davenport DL, et al. Preoperative opioid use and incidence of surgical site infection after repair of ventral and incisional hernias. Surgery 2020; 168: 921-5.

12.    Arslani N. Clinical Comparation of Postoperative Complications after Lichtenstein versus Bassini Inguinal Hernia Repair. Albanian J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 4: 695-8.

13.    Prasad D, Patel Y. A study of outcome and complications of emergency inguinal hernias repair. Int Surg J 2020; 7: 419-22.

14.    Jacombs AS, Karatassas A, Klosterhalfen B, Richter K, Patiniott P, Hensman C. Biofilms and effective porosity of hernia mesh: are they silent assassins? Hernia 2020; 24: 197-204.

15.    Forester B, Attaar M, Lach M, Chirayil S, Kuchta K, Denham W, et al. Inguinal hernia mesh is safe in 1720 patients. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 1609-18.

16.    Schneeberger SJ, Kraft CT, Janis JE. No-touch technique of mesh placement in ventral hernia repair: minimizing postoperative mesh infections. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145: 1288-91.

17.    Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Dhanani NH, Lyons NB, Harvin JA, Millas SG, et al. Synthetic versus biologic mesh for complex open ventral hernia repair: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Infect 2021; 22: 496-503.

18.    Pande T, Naidu CS. Mesh infection in cases of polypropylene mesh hernioplasty. Hernia 2020; 24: 849-56.

19.    Ahmed H. Seroma reduction and role of tranexamic acid in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Pak 2020; 25: 89-92.

20.    Pardhan A, Mazahir S, Alvi AR, Murtaza G. Surgical site infection following hernia repair in the day care setting of a developing country: a retrospective review. J Pak Med Assoc 2013; 63: 760-2.

21.    Taylor EW, Duffy K, Lee K, Hill R, Noone A, Macintyre I, et al. Surgical site infection after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 105-11.

22.    Olsen MA, Nickel KB, Wallace AE, Mines D, Fraser VJ, Warren DK. Stratification of surgical site infection by operative factors and comparison of infection rates after hernia repair. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 36: 329-35.

23.    Kaafarani HM, Kaufman D, Reda D, Itani KM. Predictors of surgical site infection in laparoscopic and open ventral incisional herniorrhaphy. J Surg Res 2010; 163: 229-34.

24.    Saeed S, Siddiqui M, Altaf R. The Obstructive Lung Diseases Program: Integrated obstructive lung disease services within primary care in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2022; 38: 334-9

25.    Malik AM, Khan A, Talpur KA, Laghari AA. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in elderly population undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. J Pak Med Assoc 2010; 60: 45-7.

26.    Jawaid M, Masood Z, Iqbal SA. Post-operative complications in a general surgical ward of a teaching hospital. Pak J Med Sci 2006; 22: 171-5.